The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CONTEMPORARY CONVERSION REACTIONS: A CLINICAL STUDY
Abstract
1. Our operational criteria for the diagnosis of conversion reactions are discussed, and an analysis of a series of 134 consecutive patients so diagnosed is presented. 2. From our contemporary point of view, 4 clinical aspects of the conversion reaction phenomenon are discussed and illustrated. These clinical aspects are : a) "classical" symptom patterns of "loss of function" and "hystero-epilepsy," b) simulation of known organic disease entities with varying degrees of expertness, c) symptom patterns in which bodily pain is a predominant feature, and d) symptom aggregates in which conversion symptoms are intermingled with those of an organic and/or psychophysiological nature. 3. In addition to patients evidencing the well-known relationship between conversion mechanisms and neurotic anxiety, in our conversion series there was a group of 40 patients with clinically evident features of depression, a group of 19 patients with clinical features of incipient schizophrenia, and a group of adolescents with characteristic ego identity problems. These subgroups were not randomly distributed within the parent group, but had significantly different parameters. We conclude that conversion reactions serve to reduce or avoid less tolerable depression, neurotic anxiety, the threat of psychotic disorganization, and the painful affects associated with adolescent ego identity problems. 4. Less than one-half of our conversion patients could be considered so call "hysterical personalities." We prefer the term "histrionic personality" to "hysterical personality," since the former calls attention to the essential characterological feature, i.e., a propensity for transparent dramatization. 5. It was found that a significantly greater proportion of our patients had occupied the position of the youngest child, or the youngest child of one sex in the family than would have been expected by chance alone. It is postulated that these and other "special person" relationships within the family group in early life may lead to difficulties in role stabilization in later life. 6. The majority of our patients regarded themselves as organically ill and a direct recommendation of psychotherapy was usually rejected. A more oblique therapeutic approach was sometimes effective. The potential therapeutic usefulness of a convalescent ward in a general hospital is suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Whitlock, F. A. (1967) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1967.tb11023.x · Cited by 481
Slater, E. (1965) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5447.1395 · Cited by 379
Psychiatric Disorder in the General Hospital
Mayou, R., & Hawton, K. (1986) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.149.2.172 · Cited by 332
Natural history and outcome of psychogenic seizures: a clinical study in 50 patients
Lempert, T., & Schmidt, D. (1990) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/bf00319665 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- ZIEGLER, F. J., IMBODEN, J. B., & MEYER, E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1960-04
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 901-910
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2007714072
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONTEMPORARY CONVERSION REACTIONS: A CLINICAL STUDY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.116.10.901
- The paper
- ZIEGLER, F. J., IMBODEN, J. B., & MEYER, E. (1960). CONTEMPORARY CONVERSION REACTIONS: A CLINICAL STUDY. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.116.10.901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.