The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE CATECHOLAMINE HYPOTHESIS OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS: A REVIEW OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
Abstract
The "catecholamine hypothesis of affective disorders" proposes that some, if not all, depressions are associated with an absolute or relative decrease in catecholamines, particularly norepinephrine, available at central adrenergic receptor sites. Elation, conversely, may be associated with an excess of such amines. Evidence supporting this hypothesis was reviewed. Data from pharmacological studies, mainly in animals, suggest that the actions of both major classes of antidepressant drugs are mediated through the catecholamines. The monoamine oxidase inhibitors increase brain concentrations of norepinephrine while imipramine-like agents potentiate the physiological effects of norepinephrine. Reserpine, a drug which can cause clinical depression, depletes catecholamines, but other amines may also be involved in its mechanism of action. A rigorous extrapolation from pharmacological studies to pathophysiology clearly cannot be made. Clinical studies relevant to the catecholamime hypothesis are limited and the findings are inconclusive. It is not possible, therefore, to confirm definitively or to reject the catecholamine hypothesis on the basis of data currently available. In our present state of knowledge, however, the catecholamine hypothesis is of considerable heuristic value, providing the investigator and the clinician with a frame of reference integrating much of our experience with those pharmacological agents which produce alterations in human affective states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1001/jama.1955.02960260011004 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-8306-2_14 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8306-2_14
- Axelrod J., 1963, : The Clinical Chemistry of Monoamines.
- 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60119-3 · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60119-3
- Bergsman A., 1959, Acta Psychiat. Neurol. Scand. 33:suppl. 133
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1957.tb40753.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710170050006 · DOI
- Carlsson A., 1961, Neuropsychopharmacology, 2, 417
- 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60110-7 · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60110-7
- 10.1038/1801200a0 · DOI · Paper page
- Carlsson A., 1960, : Adrenergic Mechanisms.
- 10.1007/BF00404124 · DOI
- Chessin M., 1957, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 119, 453, 10.1016/S0022-3565(25)11898-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-8306-2_16 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8306-2_16
- Cole, 1961, J. 0., Jones, R. T., and Kierman, C. L.: Drug Therapy, Progr. Neurol. Psychiat., 16, 539
- Cole, 1960, J. 0., Klerman, G. L., and Jones, R. T.: Drug Therapy, Progr. Neurol. Psychiat., 15, 540
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(63)91084-5 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Cognitive Therapy of Depression
HOLLON, S. D., & BECK, A. T. (1979) · Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404480-7.50012-5 · Cited by 4,685
Gray, J. A. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00013066 · Cited by 4,477
Depression: a new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments
PORSOLT, R. D., LE PICHON, M., & JALFRE, M. (1977) · Nature · doi:10.1038/266730a0 · Cited by 4,451
Malhi, G. S., & Mann, J. J. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31948-2 · Cited by 4,099
Otte, C., Gold, S. M., Penninx, B. W., Pariante, C. M., Etkin, A., Fava, M., Mohr, D. C., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.65 · Cited by 2,269
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHILDKRAUT, J. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1965-11
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 509-522
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2072219714
- Cited by
- 3,492
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE CATECHOLAMINE HYPOTHESIS OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS: A REVIEW OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.122.5.509
- The paper
- SCHILDKRAUT, J. J. (1965). THE CATECHOLAMINE HYPOTHESIS OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS: A REVIEW OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.122.5.509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.