Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,492

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE CATECHOLAMINE HYPOTHESIS OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS: A REVIEW OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE

SCHILDKRAUT, JOSEPH J.·1965·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The "catecholamine hypothesis of affective disorders" proposes that some, if not all, depressions are associated with an absolute or relative decrease in catecholamines, particularly norepinephrine, available at central adrenergic receptor sites. Elation, conversely, may be associated with an excess of such amines. Evidence supporting this hypothesis was reviewed. Data from pharmacological studies, mainly in animals, suggest that the actions of both major classes of antidepressant drugs are mediated through the catecholamines. The monoamine oxidase inhibitors increase brain concentrations of norepinephrine while imipramine-like agents potentiate the physiological effects of norepinephrine. Reserpine, a drug which can cause clinical depression, depletes catecholamines, but other amines may also be involved in its mechanism of action. A rigorous extrapolation from pharmacological studies to pathophysiology clearly cannot be made. Clinical studies relevant to the catecholamime hypothesis are limited and the findings are inconclusive. It is not possible, therefore, to confirm definitively or to reject the catecholamine hypothesis on the basis of data currently available. In our present state of knowledge, however, the catecholamine hypothesis is of considerable heuristic value, providing the investigator and the clinician with a frame of reference integrating much of our experience with those pharmacological agents which produce alterations in human affective states.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.122.5.509

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1001/jama.1955.02960260011004 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-1-4684-8306-2_14 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8306-2_14
  3. Axelrod J., 1963, : The Clinical Chemistry of Monoamines.
  4. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60119-3 · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60119-3
  5. Bergsman A., 1959, Acta Psychiat. Neurol. Scand. 33:suppl. 133
  6. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1957.tb40753.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710170050006 · DOI
  8. Carlsson A., 1961, Neuropsychopharmacology, 2, 417
  9. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60110-7 · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60110-7
  10. 10.1038/1801200a0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Carlsson A., 1960, : Adrenergic Mechanisms.
  12. 10.1007/BF00404124 · DOI
  13. Chessin M., 1957, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 119, 453, 10.1016/S0022-3565(25)11898-3 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/978-1-4684-8306-2_16 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8306-2_16
  15. Cole, 1961, J. 0., Jones, R. T., and Kierman, C. L.: Drug Therapy, Progr. Neurol. Psychiat., 16, 539
  16. Cole, 1960, J. 0., Klerman, G. L., and Jones, R. T.: Drug Therapy, Progr. Neurol. Psychiat., 15, 540
  17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(63)91084-5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 3,492

Metadata

Authors
SCHILDKRAUT, J. J.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1965-11
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
509-522
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2072219714
Cited by
3,492
References
0
FWCI
39.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE CATECHOLAMINE HYPOTHESIS OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS: A REVIEW OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.122.5.509
The paper
SCHILDKRAUT, J. J. (1965). THE CATECHOLAMINE HYPOTHESIS OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS: A REVIEW OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.122.5.509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.