The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tests of competency to consent to treatment
Abstract
The authors describe the various tests of competency to consent to treatment used today, which include the following: 1)evidencing a choice, 2)"reasonable" outcome of choice, 3)choice based on "rational" reasons, 4)ability to understand, and 5)actual understanding. They analyze the applicability of these tests to patients' decisions to accept or refuse psychiatric treatment and illustrate the problems of ap-lying these tests by citing clinical case examples. They find that the circumstances in which competency becomes an issue determine which elements of which tests are stressed and which are underplayed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198812223192504 · Cited by 1,399
The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions
(1997) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.48.11.1415 · Cited by 704
The Competency of Children and Adolescents to Make Informed Treatment Decisions
Weithorn, L. A., & Campbell, S. B. (1982) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130087 · Cited by 688
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499323 · Cited by 595
Assessing Decisional Capacity for Clinical Research or Treatment: A Review of Instruments
Dunn, L. B., Nowrangi, M. A., Palmer, B. W., Jeste, D. V., & Saks, E. R. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.8.1323 · Cited by 464
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1977-03-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-284
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W1713381994
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tests of competency to consent to treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.134.3.279
- The paper
- Tests of competency to consent to treatment. (1977). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.134.3.279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
