The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical magnetic resonance imaging changes in elderly inpatients with major depression
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of elderly depressed patients differ from MRI scans of age-matched control subjects and age-matched patients with Alzheimer's disease. METHOD: The authors studied 21 patients 60 years or older with major depression, 16 patients with Alzheimer's disease, and 14 age-matched control subjects. RESULTS: Compared to control subjects, depressed patients had greater cerebral sulcal and temporal sulcal atrophy; larger sylvian fissures, lateral ventricles, third ventricles, and temporal horns; and greater severity of subcortical white matter lesions. Depressed patients also had more basal ganglia lesions but similar levels of periventricular hyperintensity. There were no differences between depressed patients with and without delusions on any MRI measure. Depressed patients who received ECT had more temporal horn atrophy and greater subcortical abnormality summary scores than normal subjects. Cortical sulcal atrophy correlated with age at onset of depression. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that elderly hospitalized depressed patients have greater cortical as well as subcortical atrophy and more basal ganglia lesions than age-matched normal control subjects. The correlation of these abnormalities with outcome remains unknown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observations on the brains of demented old people
Tomlinson, B. E., Blessed, G., & Roth, M. (1970) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(70)90063-8 · Cited by 2,084
Observations on the brains of non-demented old people
Tomlinson, B. E., Blessed, G., & Roth, M. (1968) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(68)90154-8 · Cited by 681
Circumscribed changes of the cerebral cortex in neuropsychiatric disorders of later life.
Bowen, D. M., Najlerahim, A., Procter, A. W., Francis, P. T., & Murphy, E. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.23.9504 · Cited by 157
Cited by
The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.
Fried, L. P., Borhani, N. O., Enright, P., Furberg, C. D., Gardin, J. M., Kronmal, R. A., Kuller, L. H., Manolio, T. A., Mittelmark, M. B., Newman, A., et al. (1991) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w · Cited by 3,652
Glucocorticoids and Hippocampal Atrophy in Neuropsychiatric Disorders
Sapolsky, R. M. (2000) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.10.925 · Cited by 2,016
Hippocampal atrophy in recurrent major depression
Sheline, Y. I., Wang, P. W., Gado, M. H., Csernansky, J. G., & Vannier, M. W. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.9.3908 · Cited by 1,932
Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., van Haren, N. E. M., Lensvelt‐Mulders, G. J. L. M., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., & Kahn, R. S. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20801 · Cited by 902
MRI-defined vascular depression
(1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.4.497 · Cited by 770
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1991-05-01
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 617-620
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W172253351
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical magnetic resonance imaging changes in elderly inpatients with major depression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.148.5.617
- The paper
- Cortical magnetic resonance imaging changes in elderly inpatients with major depression. (1991). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.148.5.617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.