The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical effects of clozapine in chronic schizophrenia: response to treatment and predictors of outcome
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study addressed the unique clinical properties attributed to the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, including its efficacy in patients with treatment-refractory psychosis and against negative symptoms, its lack of acute extrapyramidal side effects, and the longer time course of its therapeutic effects. METHOD: The clinical responses of 84 schizophrenic inpatients (66 with treatment-refractory illness and 18 who were intolerant of antipsychotic treatment) were examined. After all previous antipsychotic medications had been withdrawn, the patients were treated with clozapine according to a standardized titration and dosage schedule. Patients who tolerated and responded to treatment were discharged and maintained on a regimen of clozapine for up to 52 weeks. Patients were evaluated for behavioral response and side effects after weeks 3, 6, 12, 26, 39, and 52 of treatment. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the patients with treatment-refractory illness and 76% of the treatment-intolerant patients responded to clozapine in up to 52 weeks. The optimal period for a trial of clozapine appeared to be 12-24 weeks. Clozapine exhibited therapeutic effects on negative symptoms, but these were not clearly independent of its effects on positive symptoms and extrapyramidal side effects. Several variables, including early age at onset of illness and female gender, were found to be predictors of poor response to treatment. Predictors of good response included the presence of extrapyramidal side effects during previous treatment with classic neuroleptics and a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for the use of clozapine and our understanding of the pathophysiology of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Cited by
Sex differences in schizophrenia
Abel, K. M., Drake, R., & Goldstein, J. M. (2010) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261.2010.515205 · Cited by 762
Falkai, P., Wobrock, T., Lieberman, J., Glenthoj, B., Gattaz, W. F., Möller, H.-J., WFSBP Task Force on Treatment Guide, Falkai, P., Wobrock, T., Lieberman, J., et al. (2006) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622970500483177 · Cited by 331
Mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs: a critical analysis
Kinon, B. J., & Lieberman, J. A. (1996) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245602 · Cited by 317
Falkai, P., Wobrock, T., Lieberman, J., Glenthoj, B., Gattaz, W. F., Möller, H.-J., WFSBP Task Force on Treatment Guidelines for Schizophrenia, Falkai, P., Wobrock, T., Lieberman, J., et al. (2005) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622970510030090 · Cited by 269
The acute efficacy of antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review of recent meta-analyses
Haddad, P. M., & Correll, C. U. (2018) · Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/2045125318781475 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1744-1752
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W940697911
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical effects of clozapine in chronic schizophrenia: response to treatment and predictors of outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.151.12.1744
- The paper
- Clinical effects of clozapine in chronic schizophrenia: response to treatment and predictors of outcome. (1994). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.151.12.1744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.