Changes in pathological narcissism
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated types of change that occur over time in the psychopathology of narcissistic patients. METHOD: Baseline scores on the Diagnostic Interview for Narcissism of 20 patients, clinically diagnosed as having narcissistic personality disorder, were contrasted with their scores 3 years later by means of t tests and chi-square statistics. The authors then compared these changes in narcissism with the patients' accounts of their life events during the interval between the two assessments. RESULTS: A significant decrease in the overall level of pathological narcissism was found, particularly in the areas of interpersonal relations and reactiveness. At follow-up, 60% of the subjects had reached the cutoff score on the diagnostic interview that indicated significant improvement, and 40% remained unchanged, with a high level of pathological narcissism. A high baseline level of narcissism in interpersonal relations was associated with absence of change at follow-up. Examination of life events in the interval between assessments suggests that changes in pathological narcissism are related to three kinds of experiences: achievements, new durable relationships, and disillusionments. CONCLUSIONS: The instability of narcissistic psychopathology found in this study raises questions about the construct validity of narcissistic personality disorder as a diagnostic category and about the core construct of pathological narcissism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have documented the persistence of narcissistic pathology, even among patients who improve symptomatically.
“Overall, studies (Table 2) (76–83) have documented the persistence of narcissistic pathology, even among patients who improve symptomatically.”
From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [79]
Life events, such as achievements, new relationships, and disillusionments, when processed in a sympathetic environment, allow some patients with NPD to learn from these experiences and to improve symptomatically.
“Life events, such as achievements, new relationships, and disillusionments, when processed in a sympathetic environment, allow some patients to learn from these experiences and to improve symptomatically (79).”
From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [79]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Ronningstam, E. F., Gunderson, J. G., & Lyons, M. J.
- Affiliations
- McLean Hospital (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-257
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W1676768304
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- pathological narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, change over time, life events, interpersonal relationships, construct validity, disillusionment, achievement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Narcissism, Personality Disorders, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Chi-Square Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review