The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resistance to antidepressant medications and short-term clinical response to ECT
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, it has been widely assumed that the likelihood of response to ECT is independent of the adequacy of previous treatment with antidepressant medications. However, recent research has raised the possibility that medication-resistant patients with depression have a poorer clinical ECT outcome than patients who have not failed previous adequate medication trials. METHOD: Medication resistance of 100 patients with primary, unipolar, nonpsychotic major depression was evaluated during the index episode with the Antidepressant Treatment History Form. Patients were recruited and treated with ECT at three sites; standardized ECT and clinical assessment procedures were used. Clinical outcome was assessed immediately and 1 week after completion of the ECT course. RESULTS: Patients who previously had failed one or more adequate antidepressant medication trials were less likely to respond to subsequent ECT than patients not known to be medication resistant. This finding held within each study site, whether clinical response was assessed categorically or in terms of the magnitude of symptomatic improvement and after the authors accounted for other potential predictors of clinical outcome. Resistance to heterocyclic antidepressants predicted poorer outcome after ECT, while resistance to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and monoamine oxidase inhibitors did not show significant predictive relations. CONCLUSIONS: While a substantial percentage of medication-resistant patients respond to ECT, clinical outcome in this group is inferior to that of patients without established medication resistance. The predictive power of medication resistance is generalizable across diverse clinical settings, particularly for heterocyclic antidepressants, which perhaps suggests an overlap in the mechanisms of actions of ECT and this medication class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
O’Reardon, J. P., Solvason, H. B., Janicak, P. G., Sampson, S., Isenberg, K. E., Nahas, Z., McDonald, W. M., Avery, D., Fitzgerald, P. B., Loo, C., et al. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018 · Cited by 1,910
Anderson, I., Ferrier, I., Baldwin, R., Cowen, P., Howard, L., Lewis, G., Matthews, K., McAllister-Williams, R., Peveler, R., Scott, J., et al. (2008) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881107088441 · Cited by 908
Malhi, G. S., Bassett, D., Boyce, P., Bryant, R., Fitzgerald, P. B., Fritz, K., Hopwood, M., Lyndon, B., Mulder, R., Murray, G., et al. (2015) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415617657 · Cited by 842
“The response rate Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(12) to unilateral ECT in patients with non-psychotic depression who have failed one or more medication trials has been shown to be as high as 48% (Prudic et al., 1996).”
BackgroundCleare, A., Pariante, C., Young, A., Anderson, I., Christmas, D., Cowen, P., Dickens, C., Ferrier, I., Geddes, J., Gilbody, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881115581093 · Cited by 759
Report by the ACNP Task Force on Response and Remission in Major Depressive Disorder
Rush, A. J., Kraemer, H. C., Sackeim, H. A., Fava, M., Trivedi, M. H., Frank, E., Ninan, P. T., Thase, M. E., Gelenberg, A. J., Kupfer, D. J., et al. (2006) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301131 · Cited by 707
Self-citation
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 985-992
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W106994774
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance to antidepressant medications and short-term clinical response to ECT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.153.8.985
- The paper
- Resistance to antidepressant medications and short-term clinical response to ECT. (1996). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.153.8.985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.