CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 332Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesReliability and Agreement in MeasurementMental Health and Psychiatry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM): reliability for substance abusers

Deborah S. Hasin, Kristin Dietz Trautman, Gloria M. Miele, S Samet, M Smith, J Endicott·1996·American Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1176/ajp.153.9.1195
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of a new semistructured diagnostic interview, the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM), for substance-abusing patients. The reliability of psychiatric diagnoses for individuals who drink heavily or use drugs has been shown to be problematic. The PRISM was designed to improve the reliability for such individuals. METHOD: A test-retest reliability study of the PRISM was conducted with 172 patients being treated in dual-diagnosis or substance abuse settings. RESULTS: Good to excellent reliability was shown for many diagnoses, including affective disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders, some anxiety disorders, and psychotic symptoms. The interview has recently been updated for DSM-IV diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The PRISM offers a method of producing psychiatric diagnoses with improved reliability for patients and other research subjects who have problems with alcohol or drugs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.153.9.1195

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kadden R, 1995, Am J Addictions, 4, 107
  2. Spirzer RL, 1992, Int J Fat Disord, 13, 137
  3. Spitzer RL, Robins E: Research Diagnostic Criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry I 978

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 332

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hasin, D. S., Trautman, K. D., Miele, G. M., Samet, S., Smith, M., & Endicott, J.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
1996-09-01
Volume
153
Issue
9
Pages
1195-1201
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
DOI
10.1176/ajp.153.9.1195
OpenAlex
W120150076
Cited by
332
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa008910-03)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA008159, AA00161, AA-08910, AA-08159, K02AA000161)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
PRISM, test-retest reliability, psychiatric diagnosis, substance abuse, dual diagnosis, alcoholism, drug use disorders, mood disorders, eating disorders, anxiety disorders, psychotic symptoms, DSM-IV
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Terminology as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review