Cited by 160Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

Elevated Putamen D 2 Receptor Binding Potential in Major Depression With Motor Retardation: An [ 11 C]Raclopride Positron Emission Tomography Study

Meyer, Jeffrey H., McNeely, Heather E., Sagrati, Sandra, Boovariwala, Anahita, Martin, Krystle, Verhoeff, N. Paul L.G., Wilson, Alan A., Houle, Sylvain·2006·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several antidepressants raise striatal dopamine, but the role of striatal dopamine during major depressive episodes is unclear. Striatal [(11)C]raclopride binding potential measured with positron emission tomography is an index of D(2) type receptors and is sensitive to extracellular dopamine levels (higher D(2) binding potential occurs when dopamine is lower). It was hypothesized that putamen D(2) binding potential would be higher during major depressive episodes featuring motor retardation. METHOD: Drug-free, nonsmoking subjects experiencing a major depressive episode (N=21) underwent [(11)C]raclopride PET imaging as did 21 healthy age-matched comparison subjects. Motor retardation was measured with the finger tapping test. RESULTS: The depressed subjects exhibiting motor retardation had significantly higher D(2) binding potential in both the left and right putamen than did healthy subjects, and putamen D(2) binding potential correlated significantly with motor speed in the depressed subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The results argue that extracellular dopamine is lower in subjects experiencing a major depressive episode that features motor retardation. This depression subtype should preferentially benefit from dopamine-increasing medications and should be targeted in future clinical trials of dopamine reuptake inhibitors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.9.1594

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 160

Authors
Meyer, J. H., McNeely, H. E., Sagrati, S., Boovariwala, A., Martin, K., Verhoeff, N. P. L. G., Wilson, A. A., & Houle, S.
Affiliations
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-09
Volume
163
Issue
9
Pages
1594-1602
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2061951979
Cited by
160
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
major depressive disorder, motor retardation, putamen, striatal dopamine, [11C]raclopride PET, finger tapping test, motor speed, dopamine reuptake inhibitors, depression subtypes
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Carbon Radioisotopes, Corpus Striatum, Major Depressive Disorder, Dopamine, Female, Homovanillic Acid, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Putamen, Sex Factors, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Motor Skills Disorders, Raclopride, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review