Gender-Specific Effects of the Catechol- O -Methyltransferase Val 108/158 Met Polymorphism on Cognitive Function in Children
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the cognitive effect of the Val108/158Met polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene in children before and during puberty. This polymorphism affects cognitive function in healthy adults and may contribute to risk for schizophrenia. METHOD: COMT genotype was determined for 8,707 children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a geographically defined general population cohort of children born between April 1, 1991, and Dec. 31, 1992, in the southwest of England. Fourteen measures of cognitive function--including working memory, verbal and motor inhibition, attentional control, and IQ--were assessed at ages 8 and 10 years. Any pubertal development at age 9 years was reported by parents. Effects of COMT genotype on cognition and interactions with gender and puberty were assessed using general linear models. RESULTS: In boys, genotype significantly affected executive function and explained up to 10 points normal variation in verbal IQ. The effects on IQ were significantly greater in pubertal than in prepubertal boys. In girls, there were no significant effects of genotype on cognition. CONCLUSIONS: This common polymorphism may be one of the genes of small effect that contribute to normal variation in IQ. The gender-specific nature of the effect and its possible interaction with puberty may be relevant to both normal cognitive and brain development and to abnormal development in disorders such as schizophrenia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behavioral findings on COMT genotype in children and adolescents are mixed.
“Behavioral findings are mixed (21-23).”
From Influence of the COMT genotype on working memory and brain activity changes during development (2011) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Barnett, J. H., Heron, J., Ring, S. M., Golding, J., Goldman, D., Xu, K., & Jones, P. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-149
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2104363283
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- catechol-O-methyltransferase, COMT Val158Met polymorphism, cognitive function, children, puberty, sex differences, executive function, IQ, working memory, inhibition, attention, schizophrenia risk, gene-environment interaction, brain development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Child, Child Development, Cognition, England, Female, Frontal Lobe, Genetic Testing, Humans, Intelligence, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Methionine, Neuropsychological Tests, Polymorphism, Genetic, Puberty, Schizophrenia, Sex Factors, Valine, Prefrontal Cortex, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review