Issues for DSM-V: incorporating patients’ subjective experiences.
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Flanagan et al. (2007) underscore how persons' lived experiences can contrast how symptoms and suffering are understood in the diagnostic literature.
“Flanagan et al. (2007) underscore how persons’ lived experiences can contrast how symptoms and suffering are understood in the diagnostic literature.”
From Moving toward connectedness – a qualitative study of recovery processes for people with borderline personality disorder (2019) · cites this paper as Flanagan et al., 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 29
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Widiger TA, Samuel DB: Diagnostic categories or dimensions? a question for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. J Abnorm Psychol 2005; 114:494-504
- Horvath AO, Symonds D: Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy. J Counseling Psychol 1991; 38:139-149
- Authors
- Flanagan, E. H., Davidson, L., & Strauss, J. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-392
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2040610067
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH069013)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Terminology › Medical Research and Practices
- Keywords
- DSM-5, psychiatric diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, patient perspectives, mental disorders classification
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Awareness, Mental Disorders, Health Status, Humans, Patient Participation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
