Cited by 134Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Pretrauma and Posttrauma Neurocognitive Functioning and PTSD Symptoms in a Community Sample of Young Adults

Parslow, Ruth A., Jorm, Anthony F.·2007·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The authors sought to assess whether neurocognitive deficits in people with the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms of reexperiencing and arousal are a consequence of these symptoms or represent a preexisting vulnerability factor for developing these symptoms after exposure to a traumatic event. Method A random sample of 2,097 young adults who participated in a longitudinal epidemiological study in 1999 and 2000 were reinterviewed in 2003 and 2004 after a major natural disaster (a widespread fire) had occurred in the region. At both interviews, participants completed a number of neurocognitive tests covering immediate and delayed word recall, digit span, coding speed, and vocabulary. Five pre- and posttrauma neurocognitive measures for 1,599 participants who were exposed to the fire were examined to assess the extent to which development of the PTSD symptoms of reexperiencing and arousal was associated with change in neurocognitive skills. Analyses adjusted for a number of potential confounding factors. Results Higher levels of fire-related reexperiencing and arousal symptoms were associated with less improvement in word recall ability at the second interview. However, levels of these symptoms were more consistently associated with having poorer pretrauma scores on all five neurocognitive measures available for this study. Conclusions The presence of the PTSD symptoms of reexperiencing and arousal may result in a relative decline in some measures of verbal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.3.509

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prospective longitudinal studies suggest that impairments in EF and related brain systems predict later psychosis, ADHD, and PTSD.

    “For example, a small number of prospective longitudinal studies have been conducted, and suggest that impairments in EF and related brain systems predict later psychosis, ADHD, and PTSD, suggesting that cognitive deficits may be a risk factor for many disorders (Cannon et al., 2006; Parslow and Jorm, 2007; Campbell and Stauffenberg, 2008).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 134

Authors
Parslow, R. A., & Jorm, A. F.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-03
Volume
164
Issue
3
Pages
509-515
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2045730034
Cited by
134
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, neurocognitive function, re-experiencing symptoms, arousal symptoms, verbal memory, word recall, cognitive vulnerability, natural disaster exposure, forest fires, young adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Australia, Data Collection, Disasters, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Fires, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review