Pretrauma and Posttrauma Neurocognitive Functioning and PTSD Symptoms in a Community Sample of Young Adults
Abstract
Objective The authors sought to assess whether neurocognitive deficits in people with the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms of reexperiencing and arousal are a consequence of these symptoms or represent a preexisting vulnerability factor for developing these symptoms after exposure to a traumatic event. Method A random sample of 2,097 young adults who participated in a longitudinal epidemiological study in 1999 and 2000 were reinterviewed in 2003 and 2004 after a major natural disaster (a widespread fire) had occurred in the region. At both interviews, participants completed a number of neurocognitive tests covering immediate and delayed word recall, digit span, coding speed, and vocabulary. Five pre- and posttrauma neurocognitive measures for 1,599 participants who were exposed to the fire were examined to assess the extent to which development of the PTSD symptoms of reexperiencing and arousal was associated with change in neurocognitive skills. Analyses adjusted for a number of potential confounding factors. Results Higher levels of fire-related reexperiencing and arousal symptoms were associated with less improvement in word recall ability at the second interview. However, levels of these symptoms were more consistently associated with having poorer pretrauma scores on all five neurocognitive measures available for this study. Conclusions The presence of the PTSD symptoms of reexperiencing and arousal may result in a relative decline in some measures of verbal…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prospective longitudinal studies suggest that impairments in EF and related brain systems predict later psychosis, ADHD, and PTSD.
“For example, a small number of prospective longitudinal studies have been conducted, and suggest that impairments in EF and related brain systems predict later psychosis, ADHD, and PTSD, suggesting that cognitive deficits may be a risk factor for many disorders (Cannon et al., 2006; Parslow and Jorm, 2007; Campbell and Stauffenberg, 2008).”
From Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches (2015) · cites this paper as Parslow and Jorm, 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Parslow, R. A., & Jorm, A. F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- ORCID
- Jorm, Anthony F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 509-515
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2045730034
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, neurocognitive function, re-experiencing symptoms, arousal symptoms, verbal memory, word recall, cognitive vulnerability, natural disaster exposure, forest fires, young adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arousal, Australia, Data Collection, Disasters, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Fires, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Verbal Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review