Early Psychosocial Intervention Following Traumatic Events
Abstract
Bill, a 35-year-old journalist working for a local radio station, was sent to report from the scene of a bomb attack that resulted in several fatalities. What he witnessed \nat the scene distressed him greatly. Immediately afterward, he began repeatedly to re-experience what had happened, leading him to avoid either discussing or thinking about it. He continued to work, but he lost interest in things \naround him. He became withdrawn, irritable, and hypervigilant. These symptoms rapidly diminished over the first few weeks, but then 1 month after the attack they began to increase again for no apparent reason. What is the differential diagnosis? How should Bill’s symptoms \nbe managed?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Practice guidelines for psychosocial interventions following traumatic events include statements warning against formal interventions being indiscriminately mandated for everyone who has experienced trauma, as trauma survivors should have control over their participation.
“practice guidelines for psychosocial interventions following traumatic events include statements warning against formal interventions being indiscriminately mandated for everyone who has experienced trauma, as trauma survivors should have control over their participation (Bisson et al., 2007;O'Donnell et al., 2020).”
From Feeling pressured to talk about trauma: How pressure to disclose alters the association between trauma disclosure and posttraumatic growth (2023) · cites this paper as Bisson et al., 2007
Higher degrees of empowerment and freedom to choose are important for trauma survivors.
“One reason we expected any amount of pressure to disclose to impede the positive disclosure-growth association was that researchers have emphasized the importance of higher degrees of empowerment and freedom to choose for trauma survivors (Bisson et al., 2007;Knight, 2018).”
From Feeling pressured to talk about trauma: How pressure to disclose alters the association between trauma disclosure and posttraumatic growth (2023) · cites this paper as Bisson et al., 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 21 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Bisson, J. I., Brayne, M., Ochberg, F. M., & Everly, G. S.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital of Wales (GB)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1016-1019
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2039856784
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- traumatic events, post-traumatic stress, trauma response, psychological intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Peer Group, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Journalism, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
