Cited by 109Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Persistence of and Changes in Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer Disease Over 6 Months: The LASER-AD Study

Ryu, S.-H.·2005·American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are common in Alzheimer disease (AD). It is important in terms of management to know their natural history and their effects on service use. The authors aimed to determine the persistence and change in severity of NPS over 6 months in participants with AD, and the relationship to initial severity, drug management, use of services, and cost of care. Methods NPS scores and data on cognition, psychotropic medication, service use, and costs of care were collected on 224 participants at baseline and on 198 at 6-month follow-up. Results Of 224 patients, 210 (93.8%) had NPS at baseline; 168 (75.0%) had at least one clinically significant symptom, 118 (80.4%) of whom had persistent significant symptoms at 6-month follow-up. There was no significant change in mean NPS score for any symptom over 6 months, but many individuals became better or worse; 61.2% of those with at least one significant baseline symptom in any domain improved. Those with persistent symptoms had more severe baseline symptoms. Deterioration in NPS was predicted by deterioration in MMSE. Those with at least one clinically significant symptom had higher care costs than those without. Conclusions NPS were highly persistent overall, but many individuals became better or worse. Persistence was predicted by having more severe symptoms at baseline. Clinically significant levels of NPS were associated with greater costs of care. The relatively few associations found between speci…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.11.976

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 109

Authors
Ryu, S.-H.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ryu, S.-H.
Venue
American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11-01
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
976-983
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034934007
Cited by
109
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
neuropsychiatric symptoms, Alzheimer's disease, symptom persistence, symptom severity, natural history (disease), psychotropic drugs, care costs, service utilization, Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive decline, undertreatment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Anxiety Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delusions, Depressive Disorder, England, Female, Hallucinations, Home Nursing, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Interview, Psychological, London, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Nursing Homes, Psychomotor Agitation, Psychotic Disorders, Psychotropic Drugs, Comorbidity, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review