Cited by 1,525Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologySchizophrenia research and treatment

Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire

Hirschfeld, Robert M.A., Williams, Janet B.W., Spitzer, Robert L., Calabrese, Joseph R., Flynn, Laurie, Keck, Paul E., Lewis, Lydia, McElroy, Susan L. +5 more·2000·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bipolar spectrum disorders, which include bipolar I, bipolar II, and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified, frequently go unrecognized, undiagnosed, and untreated. This report describes the validation of a new brief self-report screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorders called the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. METHOD: A total of 198 patients attending five outpatient clinics that primarily treat patients with mood disorders completed the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. A research professional, blind to the Mood Disorder Questionnaire results, conducted a telephone research diagnostic interview by means of the bipolar module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. RESULTS: A Mood Disorder Questionnaire screening score of 7 or more items yielded good sensitivity (0.73) and very good specificity (0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire is a useful screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder in a psychiatric outpatient population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1873

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Mood Disorders Questionnaire is one of the few screening tools for bipolar disorder and the most commonly used.

    “One of the few screening measures for bipolar disorder, and the most commonly used, is the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ) [38].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 1,525

Authors
Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Williams, J. B. W., Spitzer, R. L., Calabrese, J. R., Flynn, L., Keck, P. E., Lewis, L., McElroy, S. L., Post, R. M., Rapport, D. J., Russell, J. M., Sachs, G. S., & Zajecka, J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-11-01
Volume
157
Issue
11
Pages
1873-1875
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2143002682
Cited by
1,525
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 71
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
bipolar spectrum disorders, Mood Disorder Questionnaire, screening tool, self-report questionnaire, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, bipolar disorder not otherwise specified, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Telephone, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review