Cited by 330Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Decreased Regional Brain Metabolism After ECT

Nobler, Mitchell S., Oquendo, Maria A., Kegeles, Lawrence S., Malone, Kevin M., Campbell, Carl, Sackeim, Harold A., Mann, J. John·2001·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The antidepressant action of ECT may be related to its anticonvulsant properties. Positron emission tomography (PET) studies of regional cerebral metabolic rate for glucose were used to test this hypothesis. METHOD: Ten patients with major depression were studied with PET before and approximately 5 days after a course of bilateral ECT. Statistical parametric mapping was used to identify regions of decreased cerebral glucose metabolism. RESULTS: Widespread regions of decreased regional cerebral glucose metabolism were identified after ECT, especially in the frontal and parietal cortex, anterior and posterior cingulate gyrus, and left temporal cortex. A region-of-interest analysis similarly indicated post-ECT reductions in regional cerebral glucose metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: ECT reduces neuronal activity in selected cortical regions, a potential anticonvulsant and antidepressant effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.2.305

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decreases in sACC activity have been reported following successful treatment of depression with a variety of nonsurgical interventions including pharmacological treatments, electroconvulsive therapy, and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    “Decreases in sACC activity have been reported following successful treatment of depression with a variety of nonsurgical interventions including pharmacological treatments (Mayberg et al. 2000; Drevets et al. 2002), electroconvulsive therapy (Nobler et al. 2001), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (Mottaghy et al. 2002).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 330

Authors
Nobler, M. S., Oquendo, M. A., Kegeles, L. S., Malone, K. M., Campbell, C., Sackeim, H. A., & Mann, J. J.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2001-02-01
Volume
158
Issue
2
Pages
305-308
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2127765363
Cited by
330
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08mh001244-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH35636, R01MH040695, MH 40695, MH-01244)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
electroconvulsive therapy, regional cerebral glucose metabolism, major depressive disorder, anticonvulsant mechanism, antidepressant mechanism, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, cingulate gyrus, temporal cortex
MeSH terms
Brain, Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Frontal Lobe, Glucose, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Prefrontal Cortex, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review