Neuroanatomic Variation in Monozygotic Twin Pairs Discordant for the Narrow Phenotype for Autism
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The broader autism phenotype includes relatives of individuals with autism who display social and language deficits that are qualitatively similar to those of autism but less severe. In previous studies of monozygotic twins discordant for autism, more than 75% of the twins without autism displayed the broader phenotype. Differences in neuroanatomy between discordant monozygotic twins might be associated with the narrow and broader behavioral phenotypes. The authors examined the relationship of twin pair differences in clinical phenotype to differences in neuroanatomic phenotype. METHOD: The subjects were 16 monozygotic twin pairs between the ages of 5 and 14 years and 16 matched singleton comparison subjects. Seven twin pairs were clinically concordant and nine twin pairs were clinically discordant for strictly defined autism. After magnetic resonance imaging, a semiautomated procedure was applied to images in which the brain tissue was subdivided into neurofunctional regions and segmented into gray, white, and ventricular compartments. RESULTS: Both the concordant and discordant twin pairs exhibited concordance in cerebral gray and white matter volumes. However, only the clinically concordant pairs exhibited concordance in cerebellar gray and white matter volumes. Within the discordant twin pairs, both the twins with autism and their co-twins exhibited frontal, temporal, and occipital white matter volumes that were lower than those of the comparison subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the role and the limits of genetic liability in autism. Continuing to clarify the neuroanatomic pathways in autistic spectrum disorders could illuminate the etiology of autism and, ultimately, contribute to treatments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In twins, a discrepancy in cerebellar white matter volume is associated with a discrepancy in autism symptom scores.
“Kates et al. [272] also found that cerebellar white matter, specifically the discrepancy in volume between twins, was associated with discrepancies in the twins’ autism symptom scores.”
From Consensus Paper: Pathological Role of the Cerebellum in Autism (2012) · cites this paper as [272]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Kates, W. R., Burnette, C. P., Eliez, S., Strunge, L. A., Kaplan, D., Landa, R., Reiss, A. L., & Pearlson, G. D.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 539-546
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2156718278
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-50047, MH01142, K02MH001142, R01MH050047)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD031715, HD31715)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, monozygotic twins, twin discordance, broader autism phenotype, neuroanatomy, gray matter volume, cerebellum, genetic susceptibility, brain segmentation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebral Ventricles, Child, Child, Preschool, Diseases in Twins, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Phenotype, Reference Values, Twins, Monozygotic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review