Cited by 237Community Health and DevelopmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient Involvement

Bridging Community Intervention and Mental Health Services Research

Wells, Kenneth, Miranda, Jeanne, Bruce, Martha L., Alegria, Margarita, Wallerstein, Nina·2004·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This article explores the potential of community intervention perspectives for increasing the relevance, reach, and public health impact of mental health services research. Method The authors reviewed community intervention strategies, including public health and community development and empowerment interventions, and contrast community intervention with practice-based quality improvement and policy research. Results A model was proposed to integrate health services and community intervention research, building on the evidence-based strength of quality improvement and participatory methods of community intervention to produce complementary functions, such as linking community-based case finding and referral with practice-based quality improvement, enhanced by community-based social support for treatment adherence. Conclusions The community intervention approach is a major paradigm for affecting public health or addressing health disparities. Despite challenges in implementation and evaluation, it represents a promising approach for extending the reach of mental health services interventions into diverse communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.955

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impetus to blend or explicitly link research traditions in the service of accelerating scientific progress and enhancing public health impact is not at all new, and the idea of blending clinical effectiveness and implementation research elements is also not new.

    “The impetus to blend or explicitly link research traditions in the service of accelerating scientific progress and enhancing public health impact is not at all new,4,38–40 and the idea of blending clinical effectiveness and implementation research elements is also not new.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 237

Authors
Wells, K., Miranda, J., Bruce, M. L., Alegria, M., & Wallerstein, N.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
161
Issue
6
Pages
955-963
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2152990771
Cited by
237
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-64608, P01MH059876, MH54623, R24MH064608, P50MH054623, MH-01634, K02MH001634, MH-59876)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
community-based intervention, mental health services research, community development, empowerment interventions, public health impact, community-based case finding, referral, social support, medication adherence, health disparities, participatory research
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Community Participation, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Public Health, Quality of Health Care, Program Evaluation, Public Health Practice, Community Health Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review