The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three Psychotherapies for Anorexia Nervosa: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Few randomized, controlled trials have examined the efficacy of treatments for anorexia nervosa. Cognitive behavior therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy are effective in a related disorder, bulimia nervosa. There are theoretical and treatment indications for these therapies in anorexia nervosa. METHOD: Fifty-six women with anorexia nervosa diagnosed by using strict and lenient weight criteria were randomly assigned to three treatments. Two were specialized psychotherapies (cognitive behavior therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy), and one was a control treatment combining clinical management and supportive psychotherapy (nonspecific supportive clinical management). Therapy consisted of 20 sessions over a minimum of 20 weeks. RESULTS: For the total study group (intent-to-treat group), there were significant differences among therapies in the primary global outcome measure. Nonspecific supportive clinical management was superior to interpersonal psychotherapy, while cognitive behavior therapy was intermediate, neither worse than nonspecific supportive clinical management nor better than interpersonal psychotherapy. For the women completing therapy, nonspecific supportive clinical management was superior to the two specialized therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that nonspecific supportive clinical management was superior to more specialized psychotherapies was opposite to the primary hypothesis and challenges assumptions about the effective ingredients of successful treatments for anorexia nervosa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mortality in anorexia nervosa.
(1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.7.1073 · Cited by 974
Long-term outcome of anorexia nervosa in a prospective 21-year follow-up study
LÖWE, B., ZIPFEL, S., BUCHHOLZ, C., DUPONT, Y., REAS, D. L., & HERZOG, W. (2001) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329170100407x · Cited by 373
Cited by
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., Doll, H. A., O’Connor, M. E., Bohn, K., Hawker, D. M., Wales, J. A., & Palmer, R. L. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040608 · Cited by 829
Hay, P., Chinn, D., Forbes, D., Madden, S., Newton, R., Sugenor, L., Touyz, S., & Ward, W. (2014) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867414555814 · Cited by 656
Is cognitive–behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies?
Tolin, D. F. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.003 · Cited by 645
Anorexia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Bulik, C. M., Berkman, N. D., Brownley, K. A., Sedway, J. A., & Lohr, K. N. (2007) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20367 · Cited by 427
Self-citationEvidence-based clinical guidelines for eating disorders: international comparison
Hilbert, A., Hoek, H. W., & Schmidt, R. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0000000000000360 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- McIntosh, V. V. W., Jordan, J., Carter, F. A., Luty, S. E., McKenzie, J. M., Bulik, C. M., Frampton, C. M. A., & Joyce, P. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 741-747
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2132258405
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three Psychotherapies for Anorexia Nervosa: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.741
- The paper
- McIntosh, V. V. W., Jordan, J., Carter, F. A., Luty, S. E., McKenzie, J. M., Bulik, C. M., Frampton, C. M. A., & Joyce, P. R. (2005). Three Psychotherapies for Anorexia Nervosa: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.