The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Effectiveness of Collaborative Chronic Care Models for Mental Health Conditions Across Primary, Specialty, and Behavioral Health Care Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Collaborative chronic care models (CCMs) improve outcome in chronic medical illnesses and depression treated in primary care settings. The effect of such models across other treatment settings and mental health conditions has not been comprehensively assessed. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the comparative effectiveness of CCMs for mental health conditions across disorders and treatment settings. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials comparing CCMs with other care conditions, published or in press by August 15, 2011, were identified in a literature search and through contact with investigators. CCMs were defined a priori as interventions with at least three of the six components of the Improving Chronic Illness Care initiative (patient self-management support, clinical information systems, delivery system redesign, decision support, organizational support, and community resource linkages). Articles were included if the CCM effect on mental health symptoms or mental quality of life was reported. Data extraction included analyses of these outcomes plus social role function, physical and overall quality of life, and costs. Meta-analyses included comparisons using unadjusted continuous measures. RESULTS: Seventy-eight articles yielded 161 analyses from 57 trials (depression, N=40; bipolar disorder, N=4; anxiety disorders, N=3; multiple/other disorders, N=10). The meta-analysis indicated significant effects across disorders and care settings for depression as well as for mental and physical quality of life and social role function (Cohen's d values, 0.20-0.33). Total health care costs did not differ between CCMs and comparison models. A systematic review largely confirmed and extended these findings across conditions and outcome domains. CONCLUSIONS: CCMs can improve mental and physical outcomes for individuals with mental disorders across a wide variety of care settings, and they provide a robust clinical and policy framework for care integration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Screening and behavioral health programs integrated into routine practice can mitigate the deleterious effects of such illnesses but have not been adopted in hepatology practices.”
From A Behavioral Health Program for Alcohol Use Disorder, Substance Abuse, and Depression in Chronic Liver Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Behavioral health interventions integrated into routine clinical practice for chronic diseases have been shown to achieve the triple aim of improved health outcome, better quality of care, and reduced health care costs.1, 2”
From A Behavioral Health Program for Alcohol Use Disorder, Substance Abuse, and Depression in Chronic Liver Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“The chronic care model has been shown in multiple randomized trials to improve physical and mental health outcomes across different mental disorders, with little to no added cost 42 .”
From Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective (2018) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Collaborative care models, which involve primary care teams working in coordination with case managers and mental health specialists [12], have demonstrated to be effective and cost-effective in the treatment of depression [13]”
From A remote collaborative care program for patients with depression living in rural areas: open-label trial (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 · Cited by 10,578
Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study
Schröder, F. H., Hugosson, J., Roobol, M. J., Tammela, T. L. J., Ciatto, S., Nelen, V., KWIATKOWSKI, M. K., Lujan, M., Lilja, H. G., Zappa, M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810084 · Cited by 4,016
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness
Bodenheimer, T. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.14.1775 · Cited by 2,961
Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial
Andriole, G. L., Crawford, E. D., Grubb, R. L., Buys, S. S., Chia, D., Church, T. R., Fouad, M. N., Gelmann, E. P., Kvale, P. A., Reding, D. J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810696 · Cited by 2,922
Organizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., & Korff, M. V. (1996) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3350391 · Cited by 2,877
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness: The Chronic Care Model, Part 2
Bodenheimer, T., Wagner, E. H., & Grumbach, K. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.15.1909 · Cited by 2,413
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams, Jr., Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., Hoffing, M., Della Penna, R. D., Noël, P. H., Lin, E. H. B., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.22.2836 · Cited by 2,405
Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010 · Cited by 2,053
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Ofman JJ, 2004, a systematic review. Am J Med, 117, 182
- Renders CM, 2001, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1, CD001481
- Tsai AC, 2005, Am J Manag Care, 11, 478
- Parks J, 2006, Morbidity and Mortality in People with Serious Mental Illness
- Mann AH, 1998, Br J Gen Med, 48, 875
- Unützer J, 2008, Am J Manag Care, 14, 95
- Bauer MS, Med Care
- 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.12.2047 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist
Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L. J., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J. L., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2015) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9 · Cited by 2,168
Self-citationPersonalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions
Coulter, A., Entwistle, V. A., Eccles, A., Ryan, S., Shepperd, S., & Perera, R. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010523.pub2 · Cited by 592
van Ginneken, N., Tharyan, P., Lewin, S., Rao, G. N., Meera, S., Pian, J., Chandrashekar, S., & Patel, V. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009149.pub2 · Cited by 575
Carvalho, A. F., Firth, J., & Vieta, E. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1906193 · Cited by 562
Comorbid depression in medical diseases
Gold, S. M., Köhler‐Forsberg, O., Moss-Morris, R. E., Mehnert-Theuerkauf, A., Miranda, J. J., Bullinger, M., Steptoe, A., Whooley, M. A., & Otte, C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0200-2 · Cited by 583
Metadata
- Authors
- Woltmann, E., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Perron, B., Georges, H., Kilbourne, A. M., & Bauer, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- From the Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis; School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; Harvard South Shore Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Harvard Medical School, Brockton, Mass.; Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor; Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 790-804
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2168474679
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 130
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079994)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- mental illness, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, quality of life, health care costs, integrated care, primary care, behavioral health services, specialist care
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Cooperative Behavior, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Long-Term Care, Medicine, Mental Health Services, Primary Health Care, Models, Organizational, Comparative Effectiveness Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
