Evaluation of the FDA Warning Against Prescribing Citalopram at Doses Exceeding 40 mg
Abstract
Objective A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning cautioned that citalopram dosages exceeding 40 mg/day may cause abnormal heart rhythms, including torsade de pointes. The authors assessed relationships between citalopram use and ventricular arrhythmias and mortality. Method A cohort study was conducted using Veterans Health Administration data between 2004 and 2009 from depressed patients who received a prescription for citalopram (N=618,450) or for sertraline (N=365,898), a comparison medication with no FDA warning. Cox regression models, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, were used to examine associations of antidepressant dosing with ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac, noncardiac, and all-cause mortality. Results Citalopram daily doses >40 mg were associated with lower risks of ventricular arrhythmia (adjusted hazard ratio=0.68, 95% CI=0.61-0.76), all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio=0.94, 95% CI=0.90-0.99), and noncardiac mortality (adjusted hazard ratio=0.90, 95% CI=0.86-0.96) compared with daily doses of 1-20 mg. No increased risks of cardiac mortality were found. Citalopram daily doses of 21-40 mg were associated with lower risks of ventricular arrhythmia (adjusted hazard ratio=0.80, 95% CI=0.74-0.86) compared with dosages of 1-20 mg/day but did not have significantly different risks of any cause of mortality. The sertraline cohort revealed similar findings, except there were no significant associations between daily dose and eith…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A subsequent observational study found no increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac mortality with citalopram or sertraline.
“A subsequent observational study found no increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac mortality with citalopram or sertraline.141”
From Assessment and management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (2015) · cites this paper as [141]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Zivin, K., Pfeiffer, P. N., Bohnert, A. S. B., Ganoczy, D., Blow, F. C., Nallamothu, B. K., & Kales, H. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 642-650
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2165464052
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Keywords
- citalopram, sertraline, antidepressant dosing, ventricular arrhythmias, torsades de pointes, all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, non-cardiac mortality, FDA warning, depression, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, veterans
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Depressive Disorder, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Citalopram, Proportional Hazards Models, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Sertraline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review