CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 149Pregnancy and Medication ImpactPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pregnancy Outcome Following In Utero Exposure to Lithium: A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study

Diav-Citrin, Orna, Shechtman, Svetlana, Tahover, Esther, Finkel-Pekarsky, Victoriya, Arnon, Judy, Kennedy, Debra, Erebara, Aida, Einarson, Adrienne, Ornoy, Asher·2014·American Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.12111402
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a prospective, comparative observational study to evaluate the risk of major anomalies following exposure to lithium during pregnancy. METHOD: A total of 183 lithium-exposed pregnancies of women who contacted the Israeli Teratology Information Service were followed up (90.2% in the first trimester) and compared with 72 disease-matched and 748 nonteratogenic-exposed pregnancies. RESULTS: There were significantly more miscarriages (adjusted odds ratio=1.94, 95% CI=1.08-3.48) and elective terminations of pregnancy (17/183 [9.3%] compared with 15/748 [2.0%]) in the lithium-exposed group compared with the nonteratogenic exposure group. The rate of major congenital anomalies after exclusion of genetic or cytogenetic anomalies was not significantly different between the three groups (lithium-exposed in the first trimester: 8/123 [6.5%]; bipolar: 2/61 [3.3%]; nonteratogenic: 19/711 [2.7%]). Cardiovascular anomalies occurred more frequently in the lithium group exposed during the first trimester when compared with the nonteratogenic exposure group (5/123 [4.1%] compared with 4/711 [0.6%]) but not after excluding anomalies that spontaneously resolved (3/123 [2.4%] compared with 2/711 [0.3%]). Ebstein's anomaly was diagnosed in one lithium-exposed fetus and in two retrospective lithium cases that were not included because contact with the information service was made after the prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound. The rate of noncardiovascular anomalies was not significantly different between the groups. The rate of preterm deliveries was higher in the lithium group compared with the nonteratogenic exposure group (18/131 [13.7%] compared with 41/683 [6.0%]). CONCLUSIONS: Lithium treatment in pregnancy is associated with a higher rate of cardiovascular anomalies. Women who are treated with lithium during organogenesis should undergo fetal echocardiography and level-2 ultrasound.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.12111402

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Wilby OK, 1987, Teratology, 35, 69
  2. Park JM, 1980, Am J Dis Child, 134, 703
  3. Cunniff CM, 1989, Teratology, 39, 447
  4. Sípek A, 1989, Cor Vasa, 31, 149
  5. Edmonds LD, 1990, Teratology, 41, 551
  6. Yacobi S, 2008, Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci, 45, 95
  7. Omtzigt JG, 1992, Neurology, 42, 119
  8. Aoki FY, 1971, Can Med Assoc J, 105, 847
  9. Troyer WA, 1993, J Perinatol, 13, 123

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Diav-Citrin, O., Shechtman, S., Tahover, E., Finkel-Pekarsky, V., Arnon, J., Kennedy, D., Erebara, A., Einarson, A., & Ornoy, A.
Affiliations
  • From the Israeli Teratology Information Service, Israel Ministry of Health, Jerusalem; the Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem; MotherSafe, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia; and the Motherisk Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto.
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
2014-07
Volume
171
Issue
7
Pages
785-794
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
DOI
10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.12111402
OpenAlex
W2160231464
Cited by
149
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3
FWCI
19.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
lithium, pregnancy, major congenital malformations, miscarriage, elective termination of pregnancy, cardiovascular anomalies, Ebstein's anomaly, preterm birth, fetal echocardiography, bipolar disorder, teratogenicity, first trimester exposure
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Abortion, Spontaneous, Abortion, Eugenic, Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Lithium Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review