Cited by 227Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsResilience and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Modifying resilience mechanisms in at-risk individuals: a controlled study of mindfulness training in Marines preparing for deployment

Open access
Johnson, Douglas C., Thom, Nathaniel J., Stanley, Elizabeth A., Haase, Lori, Simmons, Alan N., Shih, Pei-an B., Thompson, Wesley K., Potterat, Eric G. +2 more·2014·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Military deployment can have profound effects on physical and mental health. Few studies have examined whether interventions prior to deployment can improve mechanisms underlying resilience. Mindfulness-based techniques have been shown to aid recovery from stress and may affect brain-behavior relationships prior to deployment. The authors examined the effect of mindfulness training on resilience mechanisms in active-duty Marines preparing for deployment. METHOD: Eight Marine infantry platoons (N=281) were randomly selected. Four platoons were assigned to receive mindfulness training (N=147) and four were assigned to a training-as-usual control condition (N=134). Platoons were assessed at baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and during and after a stressful combat training session approximately 9 weeks after baseline. The mindfulness training condition was delivered in the form of 8 weeks of Mindfulness-Based Mind Fitness Training (MMFT), a program comprising 20 hours of classroom instruction plus daily homework exercises. MMFT emphasizes interoceptive awareness, attentional control, and tolerance of present-moment experiences. The main outcome measures were heart rate, breathing rate, plasma neuropeptide Y concentration, score on the Response to Stressful Experiences Scale, and brain activation as measured by functional MRI. RESULTS: Marines who received MMFT showed greater reactivity (heart rate [d=0.43]) and enhanced recovery (heart rate [d=0.67], breathing rate [d=0.93]) after stressful training; lower plasma neuropeptide Y concentration after stressful training (d=0.38); and attenuated blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal in the right insula and anterior cingulate. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that mechanisms related to stress recovery can be modified in healthy individuals prior to stress exposure, with important implications for evidence-based mental health research and treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13040502

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among military veterans, mindfulness-based interventions have shown efficacy in targeting various aspects of psychological health, including PTSD, depression, and quality of life.

    “For example, among military veterans, mindfulness-based interventions have shown efficacy in targeting various aspects of psychological health, including PTSD, depression, and quality of life [[17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]].”

    From Mindful attention training workshop for firefighters: Design and methodology of a pilot randomized clinical trial (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Abstract Results and Discussion report that mindfulness training improved recovery from stress in active-duty Marines preparing for deployment. They do not establish efficacy among veterans or report improvements in PTSD, depression, or quality of life; the Discussion describes effects in clinical populations as speculative. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness-based interventions, administered to military service members prior to combat stress training, have shown preliminary efficacy in reducing biomarkers of stress, compared to as-usual training.

    “Further, mindfulness-based interventions, administered to military service members prior to combat stress training, have shown preliminary efficacy in reducing biomarkers of stress, compared to as-usual training [17].”

    From Mindful attention training workshop for firefighters: Design and methodology of a pilot randomized clinical trial (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Method describes mindfulness training before a stressful combat-training session, with a training-as-usual control group. The Results > Biomarkers section reports lower post-training plasma neuropeptide Y in the mindfulness group, but does not report reductions in multiple stress biomarkers; the claim’s plural wording overstates that finding. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness-based interventions are feasible and lead to improved health outcomes among several high-stress populations, such as military personnel, physicians, firefighters, and inner-city teachers.

    “MBIs have been shown to be feasible and to lead to improved health outcomes among several high-stress populations, such as military personnel [32, 33], physicians [34, 35], firefighters [36], and inner-city teachers [37].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 227

Authors
Johnson, D. C., Thom, N. J., Stanley, E. A., Haase, L., Simmons, A. N., Shih, P.-A. B., Thompson, W. K., Potterat, E. G., Minor, T. R., & Paulus, M. P.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Douglas C.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2014-08
Volume
171
Issue
8
Pages
844-853
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2100835978
Cited by
227
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Office of Naval Research
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01DK087813)
  • Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
mindfulness training, resilience, military deployment, Marines, combat stress, stress recovery, heart rate reactivity, neuropeptide Y, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, interoceptive awareness, attentional control
MeSH terms
Brain, Heart Rate, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Military Personnel, Neuropeptide Y, Respiration, Stress, Psychological, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review