Cited by 299Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesStress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Toward a Biosignature for Suicide

Open access
Oquendo, Maria A., Sullivan, Gregory M., Sudol, Katherin, Baca-Garcia, Enrique, Stanley, Barbara H., Sublette, M. Elizabeth, Mann, J. John·2014·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Suicide, a major cause of death worldwide, has distinct biological underpinnings. The authors review and synthesize the research literature on biomarkers of suicide, with the aim of using the findings of these studies to develop a coherent model for the biological diathesis for suicide. METHOD: The authors examined studies covering a large range of neurobiological systems implicated in suicide. They provide succinct descriptions of each system to provide a context for interpreting the meaning of findings in suicide. RESULTS: Several lines of evidence implicate dysregulation in stress response systems, especially the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, as a diathesis for suicide. Additional findings related to neuroinflammatory indices, glutamatergic function, and neuronal plasticity at the cellular and circuitry level may reflect downstream effects of such dysregulation. Whether serotonergic abnormalities observed in individuals who have died by suicide are independent of stress response abnormalities is an unresolved question. CONCLUSIONS: The most compelling biomarkers for suicide are linked to altered stress responses and their downstream effects, and to abnormalities in the serotonergic system. Studying these systems in parallel and in the same populations may elucidate the role of each and their interplay, possibly leading to identification of new treatment targets and biological predictors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14020194

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The serotonin pathway is by far the best described pathway in depression, and several alterations in this pathway have been associated with suicidal behaviour.

    “The serotonin pathway is by far the best described pathway in depression and several alterations in this pathway have been associated with suicidal behaviour.”

    From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as [128]

    The Serotonin section says the serotonergic system has the most extensive body of research in suicide and that many studies link altered serotonin transmission to suicide risk. It does not say serotonin is the best-described pathway in depression; the claim shifts that comparison from suicide to depression. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 176 · Cited by 299

Authors
Oquendo, M. A., Sullivan, G. M., Sudol, K., Baca-Garcia, E., Stanley, B. H., Sublette, M. E., & Mann, J. J.
Affiliations
  • From the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York; the Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology Division, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York; the Centers for Biomedical Research Network on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Madrid; and the Department of Psychiatry, Fundación Jiménez Diaz Hospital and Autonomous University of Madrid.
  • Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
171
Issue
12
Pages
1259-1277
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2110119632
Cited by
299
References
176
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 10
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH48514, P50MH090964, MH48514, R01MH048514, MH090964)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
suicide, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, stress response dysregulation, neuroinflammation, glutamatergic function, neuroplasticity, suicide risk prediction
MeSH terms
Brain, Dopamine, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Inflammation, Locus Coeruleus, Neuronal Plasticity, Norepinephrine, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Serotonin, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Biomarkers, Neurotransmitter Agents, Glutamic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review