Starting from something: augmenting exposure therapy and methods of inquiry
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many patients struggle with distress and avoidance during treatment, and fail to receive an adequate dose of PE.
“Many patients struggle with distress and avoidance during treatment, and fail to receive an adequate dose of PE (Foa et al., 2005; Tuerk, 2014).”
From Augmenting Prolonged Exposure therapy for PTSD with intranasal oxytocin: a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial (2018) · cites this paper as Tuerk, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Tuerk, P. W.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tuerk, Peter W.
- ORCID
- Tuerk, Peter W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1034-1037
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2069876751
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- exposure therapy, methods of inquiry
- MeSH terms
- Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Methylene Blue, Phobic Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
