Baseline Striatal Functional Connectivity as a Predictor of Response to Antipsychotic Drug Treatment
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Clinical response to antipsychotic drug treatment is highly variable, yet prognostic biomarkers are lacking. The authors recently demonstrated that successful antipsychotic drug treatment alters resting-state functional connectivity of the striatum. The goal of the present study was to test whether intrinsic striatal connectivity patterns provide prognostic information and can serve as a potential biomarker of treatment response to antipsychotic drugs. METHOD: The authors used resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) to develop a prognostic index in a discovery cohort of 41 first-episode schizophrenia patients, then tested this index in an independent cohort of 40 newly hospitalized chronic patients with acute psychosis. In the discovery cohort, patients underwent resting-state fMRI scanning at the initiation of randomized controlled treatment with a second-generation antipsychotic. Whole-brain functional connectivity maps were generated for each subject from striatal seed regions. A stringent measure of clinical response was calculated that required sustained improvement over two consecutive study visits. Clinical response was entered into a survival analysis, and Cox regression was applied to the functional connectivity data. A striatal connectivity index was created, comprising functional connections of the striatum that predicted treatment response. This striatal connectivity index was tested on a generalizability cohort of patients with psychotic disorders who were hospitalized for an acute psychotic episode. RESULTS: A total of 91 regions functionally connected with the striatum provided significant prognostic information. Connectivity in these regions was used to create a baseline striatal connectivity index that predicted response to antipsychotic treatment with high sensitivity and specificity in both the discovery and generalizability cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that individual differences in striatal functional connectivity predict response to antipsychotic drug treatment in acutely psychotic patients. With further development, this has the potential to serve as a prognostic biomarker with clinical utility and to reduce the overall burden associated with psychotic illnesses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have indicated cortico-striatal network dysregulation is linked to psychotic symptoms, symptom severity, and response to antipsychotic treatment.
“insofar as many studies have indicated cortico-striatal network dysregulation is linked to psychotic symptoms [60], symptom severity [61], and response to antipsychotic treatment [62].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 212
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- [1]Perälä J Suvisaari J Saarni SI Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007 64 19 28 17199051
- [3]van Os J Kapur S Schizophrenia Lancet 2009 374 635 645 19700006
- [4]Laursen TM Life expectancy among persons with schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder Schizophr Res 2011 131 101 104 21741216
- [5]Conley RR Kelly DL Management of treatment resistance in schizophrenia Biol Psychiatry 2001 50 898 911 11743944
- [7]Ascher-Svanum H Nyhuis AW Faries DE Clinical, functional, and economic ramifications of early nonresponse to antipsychotics in the naturalistic treatment of schizophrenia Schizophr Bull 2008 34 1163 1171 18156640 PMC2632496
- [8]Kennedy JL Altar CA Taylor DL The social and economic burden of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic literature review Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2014 29 63 76 23995856
- [9]Leucht S Busch R Kissling W Early prediction of antipsychotic nonresponse among patients with schizophrenia J Clin Psychiatry 2007 68 352 360 17388703
- [10]Correll CU Malhotra AK Kaushik S Early prediction of antipsychotic response in schizophrenia Am J Psychiatry 2003 160 2063 2065 14594760
- [11]Gallego JA Robinson DG Sevy SM Time to treatment response in first-episode schizophrenia: should acute treatment trials last several months? J Clin Psychiatry 2011 72 1691 1696 21939612 PMC3246541
- [12]Szeszko PR Narr KL Phillips OR Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of treatment response in first-episode schizophrenia Schizophr Bull 2012 38 569 578 21084552 PMC3329996
- [13]Palaniyappan L Marques TR Taylor H Cortical folding defects as markers of poor treatment response in first-episode psychosis JAMA Psychiatry 2013 70 1031 1040 23945954 PMC7617342
- [14]Reis Marques T Taylor H Chaddock C White matter integrity as a predictor of response to treatment in first episode psychosis Brain 2014 137 172 182 24253201 PMC3891445
- [15]Hadley JA Nenert R Kraguljac NV Ventral tegmental area/midbrain functional connectivity and response to antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia Neuropsychopharmacology 2014 39 1020 1030 24165885 PMC3924537
- [16]Zhang JP Lencz T Malhotra AK D2 receptor genetic variation and clinical response to antipsychotic drug treatment: a meta-analysis Am J Psychiatry 2010 167 763 772 20194480 PMC2896457
- [18]Demjaha A Murray RM McGuire PK Dopamine synthesis capacity in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia Am J Psychiatry 2012 169 1203 1210 23034655
- [21]Sarpal DK Robinson DG Lencz T Antipsychotic treatment and functional connectivity of the striatum in first-episode schizophrenia JAMA Psychiatry 2015 72 5 13 25372846 PMC4286512
- [22]Robinson DG Woerner MG Napolitano B Randomized comparison of olanzapine versus risperidone for the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia: 4-month outcomes Am J Psychiatry 2006 163 2096 2102 17151160
- [23]Power JD Barnes KA Snyder AZ Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion Neuroimage 2012 59 2142 2154 22019881 PMC3254728
- [24]Di Martino A Scheres A Margulies DS Functional connectivity of human striatum: a resting state fMRI study Cereb Cortex 2008 18 2735 2747 18400794
- [25]Robinson DG Woerner MG Alvir JM Predictors of treatment response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder Am J Psychiatry 1999 156 544 549 10200732
- [27]Sambataro F Blasi G Fazio L Treatment with olanzapine is associated with modulation of the default mode network in patients with Schizophrenia Neuropsychopharmacology 2010 35 904 912 19956088 PMC3055362
- [28]Nielsen MO Rostrup E Wulff S Improvement of brain reward abnormalities by antipsychotic monotherapy in schizophrenia Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012 69 1195 1204 22868877
- [29]Chen CH Ridler K Suckling J Brain imaging correlates of depressive symptom severity and predictors of symptom improvement after antidepressant treatment Biol Psychiatry 2007 62 407 414 17217921
- [30]Baliki MN Petre B Torbey S Corticostriatal functional connectivity predicts transition to chronic back pain Nat Neurosci 2012 15 1117 1119 22751038 PMC3411898
- [31]Emsley R Chiliza B Asmal L The nature of relapse in schizophrenia BMC Psychiatry 2013 13 50 23394123 PMC3599855
- [32]Haynes VS Zhu B Stauffer VL Long-term healthcare costs and functional outcomes associated with lack of remission in schizophrenia: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational study BMC Psychiatry 2012 12 222 23216976 PMC3537521
- [33]Insel TR Next-generation treatments for mental disorders Sci Transl Med 2012 4 155ps19 23052292
- Authors
- Sarpal, D. K., Argyelan, M., Robinson, D. G., Szeszko, P. R., Karlsgodt, K. H., John, M., Weissman, N., Gallego, J. A., Kane, J. M., Lencz, T., & Malhotra, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Northwell Health (US)
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, North Shore-LIJ Health System, Glen Oaks, N.Y.; the Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, N.Y.; the Department of Psychiatry, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, N.Y.; and the Department of Mathematics, Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-77
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- PMC
- PMC4845897
- OpenAlex
- W1943522337
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 11.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH100264, P50MH080173, R01MH060004, R01MH076995, P30MH090590)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- antipsychotic treatment response, prognostic factors, schizophrenia, acute psychosis, atypical antipsychotics, resting-state functional connectivity, treatment response prediction
- MeSH terms
- Aripiprazole, Adolescent, Adult, Corpus Striatum, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Prognosis, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Risperidone, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review