Cited by 212Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Toward the definition of a bipolar prodrome: dimensional predictors of bipolar spectrum disorders in at-risk youths.

Open access
Hafeman, Danella M., Merranko, John, Axelson, David, Goldstein, Benjamin I., Goldstein, Tina, Monk, Kelly, Hickey, Mary Beth, Sakolsky, Dara +5 more·2016·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to assess dimensional symptomatic predictors of new-onset bipolar spectrum disorders in youths at familial risk of bipolar disorder ("at-risk" youths). METHOD: Offspring 6-18 years old of parents with bipolar I or II disorder (N=359) and community comparison offspring (N=220) were recruited. At baseline, 8.4% of the offspring of bipolar parents had a bipolar spectrum disorder. Over 8 years, 14.7% of offspring for whom follow-up data were available (44/299) developed a new-onset bipolar spectrum disorder (15 with bipolar I or II disorder). Measures collected at baseline and follow-up were reduced using factor analyses, and factors (both at baseline and at the visit prior to conversion or last contact) were assessed as predictors of new-onset bipolar spectrum disorders. RESULTS: Relative to comparison offspring, at-risk and bipolar offspring had higher baseline levels of anxiety/depression, inattention/disinhibition, externalizing, subsyndromal manic, and affective lability symptoms. The strongest predictors of new-onset bipolar spectrum disorders were baseline anxiety/depression, baseline and proximal affective lability, and proximal subsyndromal manic symptoms (p<0.05). While affective lability and anxiety/depression were elevated throughout follow-up in those who later developed a bipolar spectrum disorder, manic symptoms increased up to the point of conversion. A path analysis supported the hypothesis that affective lability at baseline predicts a new-onset bipolar spectrum disorder in part through increased manic symptoms at the visit prior to conversion; earlier parental age at mood disorder onset was also significantly associated with an increased risk of conversion. While youths without anxiety/depression, affective lability, and mania (and with a parent with older age at mood disorder onset) had a 2% predicted chance of conversion to a bipolar spectrum disorder, those with all risk factors had a 49% predicted chance of conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Dimensional measures of anxiety/depression, affective lability, and mania are important predictors of new-onset bipolar spectrum disorders in at-risk youths. These symptoms emerged from among numerous other candidates, underscoring the potential clinical and research utility of these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15040414

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Timely diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder is challenging due to the prodromal phase, in which patients do not yet meet full diagnostic criteria, and due to symptom overlap with other disorders such as anxiety and depression.

    “However, timely diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder is challenging due to the prodromal phase, in which patients do not yet meet full diagnostic criteria, and due to symptom overlap with other disorders such as anxiety and depression.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 212

Authors
Hafeman, D. M., Merranko, J., Axelson, D., Goldstein, B. I., Goldstein, T., Monk, K., Hickey, M. B., Sakolsky, D., Diler, R., Iyengar, S., Brent, D., Kupfer, D., & Birmaher, B.
Affiliations
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
173
Issue
7
Pages
695-704
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2287654992
Cited by
212
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
27.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060952, T32MH018951)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar spectrum disorders, at-risk youth, emotional lability, anxiety and depression, risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bipolar Disorder, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Risk Assessment, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review