Pain as a Predictor of Opioid Use Disorder in a Nationally Representative Sample
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to ascertain the relationship between moderate and more severe pain and prescription opioid use disorders in the noninstitutionalized U.S. METHOD: A structural equation model was used to assess prospectively the interdependency of pain and prescription opioid use disorder at waves 1 (2001-2002) and 2 (2004-2005) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Pain was measured with a 5-point scale of pain-related interference in daily activities and dichotomized as "no pain" (no or little interference) or "pain" (moderate to extreme interference). Prescription opioid use disorder was assessed with a structured interview (the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-DSM-IV version). Other covariates included age, sex, anxiety or mood disorders, and family history of drug, alcohol, and behavioral problems. RESULTS: In the structural equation model, pain and prescription opioid use disorders were significantly associated with one another at baseline and at 3-year follow-up. However, whereas pain at baseline was also significantly associated with prescription opioid use disorder at follow-up, prescription opioid use disorder at baseline was not associated with pain at follow-up. These associations were independent of several background demographic and clinical characteristics. The path for pain interference was associated with a 41% relative increase in the risk of developing a prescription opioid use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Painful conditions contribute to the risk of prescription opioid use disorders. To help reduce the incidence of prescription opioid abuse and dependence among adults with moderate to severe pain, careful monitoring and consideration of nonopioid alternative treatments is warranted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Managing patients with co-occurring chronic pain and SUD, particularly opioid use disorder, presents unique challenges including sometimes lack of trust between patients and clinicians regarding symptoms of pain and patterns of opioid use.
“Managing patients with co- occurring chronic pain and SUD - particularly opioid use dis order - presents unique challenges 294,295 , including sometimes lack of trust between patients and clinicians regarding symptoms of pain and patterns of opioid use.”
From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [294]
The Discussion (page unavailable) says reducing opioid use in patients with chronic pain is often clinically challenging and recommends ongoing pain assessment and consideration of alternative treatments. It does not describe a lack of trust between patients and clinicians about pain symptoms or opioid-use patterns, so that specific challenge is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 81
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R: CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain: United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016; 65:1-49 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/rr/rr6501e1. htm)
- Greene WH: Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Boston, Prentice Hall, 2003
- Authors
- Blanco, C., Wall, M. M., Okuda, M., Wang, S., Iza, M., & Olfson, M.
- Affiliations
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2016-12-01
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1189-1195
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2495204011
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- pain, prescription opioid use disorder, opioid use disorder, pain interference, chronic pain, opioid abuse, risk factors, NESARC
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Opioid-Related Disorders, Pain, Risk Factors, United States, Models, Statistical, Prescription Drug Misuse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review