Connectome-based prediction of cocaine abstinence
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to identify a brain-based predictor of cocaine abstinence by using connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM), a recently developed machine learning approach. CPM is a predictive tool and a method of identifying networks that underlie specific behaviors ("neural fingerprints"). METHODS: Fifty-three individuals participated in neuroimaging protocols at the start of treatment for cocaine use disorder, and again at the end of 12 weeks of treatment. CPM with leave-one-out cross-validation was conducted to identify pretreatment networks that predicted abstinence (percent cocaine-negative urine samples during treatment). Networks were applied to posttreatment functional MRI data to assess changes over time and ability to predict abstinence during follow-up. The predictive ability of identified networks was then tested in a separate, heterogeneous sample of individuals who underwent scanning before treatment for cocaine use disorder (N=45). RESULTS: CPM predicted abstinence during treatment, as indicated by a significant correspondence between predicted and actual abstinence values (r=0.42, df=52). Identified networks included connections within and between canonical networks implicated in cognitive/executive control (frontoparietal, medial frontal) and in reward responsiveness (subcortical, salience, motor/sensory). Connectivity strength did not change with treatment, and strength at posttreatment assessment also significantly predicted abstinence during follow-up (r=0.34, df=39). Network strength in the independent sample predicted treatment response with 64% accuracy by itself and 71% accuracy when combined with baseline cocaine use. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that individual differences in large-scale neural networks contribute to variability in treatment outcomes for cocaine use disorder, and they identify specific abstinence networks that may be targeted in novel interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Connectivity of networks involved in cognitive control (fronto-parietal circuits and medial frontal areas) and in reward processing (including subcortical and limbic structures) predicts abstinence in cocaine-use disorder after treatment.
“The connectivity of networks involved in cognitive control (fronto-parietal circuits and medial frontal areas) and in reward processing (including subcortical and limbic structures) has also been shown to predict abstinence in cocaine-use disorder after treatment (Yip et al., 2019).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 196
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [24]Gabrieli JD, Ghosh SS, Whitfield-Gabrieli S: Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron. 2015; 85: 11– 26. 25569345 PMC4287988
- [42]Whelan R, Garavan H: When optimism hurts: inflated predictions in psychiatric neuroimaging. Biol Psychiatry. 2014; 75: 746– 748. 23778288
- Authors
- Yip, S. W., Scheinost, D., Potenza, M. N., & Carroll, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yip, Sarah W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2019-02-01
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-164
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- PMC
- PMC6481181
- OpenAlex
- W2908006639
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA039299, P50DA009241, R01DA035058)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- cocaine dependence, cocaine abstinence, connectome-based predictive modeling, neural fingerprints, treatment response prediction, functional connectivity, large-scale brain networks, cognitive control network, treatment outcome variability
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Brain, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Cognition, Female, Galantamine, Humans, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Neural Pathways, Prognosis, Reward, Treatment Outcome, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Executive Function, Opiate Substitution Treatment, Functional Neuroimaging, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review