Cited by 19Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Ketamine: Quo Vadis?

Nemeroff, Charles B.·2018·American Journal of Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18010014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 19

Authors
Nemeroff, C. B.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Nemeroff, Charles B.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
175
Issue
4
Pages
297-299
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2795175372
Cited by
19
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
ketamine, ketamine therapy, treatment-resistant depression, NMDA receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Ketamine, Midazolam, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review