Cited by 7Digital Mental Health InterventionsTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Digital therapeutics to enhance cognition in major depression: How can we make the cognitive gains translate into functional improvements?

Harvey, Philip D.·2022·American Journal of Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.20220441

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 7

Authors
Harvey, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Harvey, Philip D.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2022-07-01
Volume
179
Issue
7
Pages
445-447
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W4283764245
Cited by
7
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
digital therapeutics, major depressive disorder, cognitive enhancement, functional recovery, cognitive gains, depression treatment
MeSH terms
Cognition, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review