The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies for Disseminating Evidence-Based Practices to Staff Who Treat People With Serious Mental Illness
Abstract
Evidence-based practices have not been widely implemented in real-world treatment settings for several reasons, including existing state laws, administrative policies, funding priorities, advocates' concerns, and program staffing. Dissemination strategies focus largely on program staffing and the question of why treatment teams that are responsible for assisting people with serious mental illness fail to use evidence-based practices. In a review of the research literature, two barriers to staff dissemination emerge: individual service providers lack the necessary knowledge and skills to assimilate these practices, and certain organizational dynamics undermine the treatment teams' ability to implement and maintain innovative approaches. Three sets of strategies are useful for overcoming these barriers and fostering dissemination: packaging evidence-based practices so that specific interventions are more accessible and user-friendly to service providers; educating providers about relevant knowledge and skills; and addressing the organizational dynamics of the team to facilitate the implementation of innovations. Research on dissemination is relatively new and is less well developed than the clinical and services research enterprise that has led to evidence-based practices. Implications for future studies are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Addis, M. E., Wade, W. A., & Hatgis, C. (1999) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.6.4.430 · Cited by 362
Cited by
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4 · Cited by 1,894
A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health
Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., Glass, J. E., & York, J. L. (2012) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558711430690 · Cited by 1,069
A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice
Simpson, D. D. (2002) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00231-3 · Cited by 538
Blase, K. A., Van Dyke, M., Fixsen, D. L., & Bailey, F. W. (2012) · Handbook of Implementation Science for Psychology in Education · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013949.004 · Cited by 395
Proctor, E. K., Knudsen, K. J., Fedoravicius, N., Hovmand, P., Rosen, A., & Perron, B. (2007) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0129-8 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Corrigan, P. W., Steiner, L., McCracken, S. G., Blaser, B., & Barr, M.
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1598-1606
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- OpenAlex
- W2122200025
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies for Disseminating Evidence-Based Practices to Staff Who Treat People With Serious Mental Illness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1598
- The paper
- Corrigan, P. W., Steiner, L., McCracken, S. G., Blaser, B., & Barr, M. (2001). Strategies for Disseminating Evidence-Based Practices to Staff Who Treat People With Serious Mental Illness. Psychiatric Services. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.