Cited by 275Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Relationship between drug treatment services, retention, and outcomes

Hser, Yih-Ing, Evans, Elizabeth, Huang, David, Anglin, Douglas M.·2004·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This longitudinal study conducted path analyses to examine the relationships between treatment processes and outcomes among patients in community-based drug treatment programs. METHODS: A total of 1,939 patients from 36 outpatient drug-free and residential treatment programs in 13 California counties were assessed at intake, discharge, three months after admission, and nine months after admission. Path analyses were conducted to relate the quantity and quality of services that were received in the first three months of treatment to treatment retention and outcomes at the nine-month follow-up. Patients were determined to have a favorable outcome if for at least 30 days before the follow-up assessment they did not use drugs, were not involved in criminal activity, and lived in the community. The path analyses controlled for patients' baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Greater service intensity and satisfaction were positively related to either treatment completion or longer treatment retention, which in turn was related to favorable treatment outcomes. Patients with greater problem severity received more services and were more likely to be satisfied with treatment. These patterns were similar for patients regardless of whether they were treated in outpatient drug-free programs or residential programs. CONCLUSIONS: The positive association between process measures-that is, greater levels of service intensity, satisfaction, and either treatment completion or retention-and treatment outcome strongly suggests that improvements in these key elements of the treatment process will improve treatment outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.55.7.767

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 275

Authors
Hser, Y.-I., Evans, E., Huang, D., & Anglin, D. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2004-07
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
767-774
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2113870463
Cited by
275
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K05 DA 00466, R01 DA 15431, K02-DA00139, R01DA015431, K02DA000139)
  • Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
addiction treatment, treatment retention, treatment outcomes, service intensity, treatment satisfaction, treatment completion, residential drug treatment, problem severity, community-based treatment, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Methadone, Middle Aged, Narcotics, Prospective Studies, Residential Treatment, Retention, Psychology, Program Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review