Effect of Voluntariness of Participation in Treatment on Short-Term Outcome of Inpatients With Schizophrenia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine associations between the voluntary or coercive nature of patients' participation in inpatient treatment and the short-term outcome of inpatient treatment for patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Eighty-eight adult patients with schizophrenia and delusional disorders who were consecutively admitted to a 320-bed psychiatric hospital in southern Germany over a three-month period in 2002 were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) at admission and discharge, a mean of 36.2 days later. The patients were grouped by whether their participation was voluntary or involuntary in each of five aspects of inpatient treatment: admission, hospital stay, medication, discharge, and intention to continue treatment after discharge. Outcome was defined as the change between admission and discharge in scores on the PANSS and the GAF and change in those scores per inpatient day. RESULTS: The outcome measures were not significantly related to the voluntariness of patients' participation in any aspect of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term outcome of inpatient treatment is independent of whether treatment is voluntary.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies found no difference in the clinical effects of involuntary admission.
“In general, these studies found either no difference in the clinical effects of involuntary admission (27,40–45) or greater improvements in clinical symptoms and functioning than for voluntary patients (46,47).”
From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Steinert, T., & Schmid, P.
- Affiliations
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 786-791
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- OpenAlex
- W2146016418
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, delusional disorder, inpatient care, involuntary treatment, short-term treatment outcomes, admission and discharge, medication adherence, Global Assessment of Functioning, PANSS
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Catchment Area, Health, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Community Participation, Delusions, Female, Germany, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Time Factors, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review