Cited by 44Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Effect of Voluntariness of Participation in Treatment on Short-Term Outcome of Inpatients With Schizophrenia

Steinert, Tilman, Schmid, Peter·2004·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine associations between the voluntary or coercive nature of patients' participation in inpatient treatment and the short-term outcome of inpatient treatment for patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Eighty-eight adult patients with schizophrenia and delusional disorders who were consecutively admitted to a 320-bed psychiatric hospital in southern Germany over a three-month period in 2002 were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) at admission and discharge, a mean of 36.2 days later. The patients were grouped by whether their participation was voluntary or involuntary in each of five aspects of inpatient treatment: admission, hospital stay, medication, discharge, and intention to continue treatment after discharge. Outcome was defined as the change between admission and discharge in scores on the PANSS and the GAF and change in those scores per inpatient day. RESULTS: The outcome measures were not significantly related to the voluntariness of patients' participation in any aspect of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term outcome of inpatient treatment is independent of whether treatment is voluntary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.55.7.786

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies found no difference in the clinical effects of involuntary admission.

    “In general, these studies found either no difference in the clinical effects of involuntary admission (27,40–45) or greater improvements in clinical symptoms and functioning than for voluntary patients (46,47).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 44

Authors
Steinert, T., & Schmid, P.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2004-07
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
786-791
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2146016418
Cited by
44
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
schizophrenia, delusional disorder, inpatient care, involuntary treatment, short-term treatment outcomes, admission and discharge, medication adherence, Global Assessment of Functioning, PANSS
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Catchment Area, Health, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Community Participation, Delusions, Female, Germany, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Time Factors, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review