Cited by 171Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and care

Understanding the Will to Live in Patients Nearing Death

Max Chochinov, Harvey, Hack, Thomas, Hassard, Thomas, Kristjanson, Linda J., McClement, Susan, Harlos, Mike·2005·Psychosomatics

Abstract

This study examined concurrent influences on the will to live in 189 patients with end-stage cancer The authors found significant correlations between the will to live and existential, psychological, social, and, to a lesser degree, physical sources of distress. Existential variables proved to have the most influence, with hopelessness, burden to others, and dignity entering into the final model. Health care providers must learn to appreciate the importance of existential issues and their ability to influence the will to live among patients nearing death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.psy.46.1.7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among patients with end-stage cancer, the will to live is negatively associated with perceived burdensomeness on others and positively associated with perceived social support.

    “among patients with end-stage cancer, the will to live was found to be negatively associated with patients’ apperceptions of burdensomeness on others and was positively associated with perceived social support (Chochinov, Hack, Hassard, Kristjanson, McClement, & Harlos, 2005)”

    From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Chochinov, Hack, Hassard, Kristjanson, McClement, & Harlos, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Max Chochinov, H., Hack, T., Hassard, T., Kristjanson, L. J., McClement, S., & Harlos, M.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
7-10
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134663856
Cited by
171
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • University of Manitoba
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
will to live, terminal cancer, dying patients, existential suffering, hopelessness, human dignity, psychological distress, social distress, physical distress, palliative care
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Attitude to Death, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Neoplasms, Pain Measurement, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Sick Role, Terminal Care, Volition, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review