Cited by 288Infant Development and Preterm CareMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The Relationship Between Acute Stress Disorder and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Shaw, Richard J., Bernard, Rebecca S., DeBlois, Thomas, Ikuta, Linda M., Ginzburg, Karni, Koopman, Cheryl·2009·Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background Having an infant hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a highly stressful event for parents. Researchers have proposed posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a model to explain the psychological reaction of parents to their NICU experience.Objective The authors sought to examine the prevalence of PTSD in parents 4 months after the birth of their premature or sick infants and the relationship of PTSD and symptoms of acute stress disorder (ASD) immediately after their infant's birth.Method Eighteen parents completed a self-report measure of ASD at baseline in addition to self-report measures of PTSD and depression at a 4-month follow-up assessment.Results In the sample, 33% of fathers and 9% of mothers met criteria for PTSD. ASD symptoms were significantly correlated with both PTSD and depression. Fathers showed a more delayed onset in their PTSD symptoms, but, by 4 months, were at even greater risk than mothers.Discussion The relatively high levels of psychological distress experienced by parents coupled with the potential negative outcomes on the parent and infant suggest that it is important to try to prepare parents for the expected psychological reactions that may occur in the event of a NICU hospitalization and also to support parents during the transition to home care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.psy.50.2.131

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 288

Authors
Shaw, R. J., Bernard, R. S., DeBlois, T., Ikuta, L. M., Ginzburg, K., & Koopman, C.
Affiliations
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Richard J.
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
131-137
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050778671
Cited by
288
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000070)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
acute stress disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, neonatal intensive care unit, parents of preterm infants, parental psychological distress, depression, gender differences, transition to home care, parental support
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child, Hospitalized, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Home Care Services, Humans, Infant, Male, Parents, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Intensive Care, Neonatal, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review