Cited by 43Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Existential despair and bipolar disorder: The therapeutic alliance as a mood stabilizer

Havens, Leston L., Ghaemi, S. Nassir·2005·American Journal of Psychotherapy

Abstract

Talking with a manic patient is not easy, but it is also not hopeless. Manic patients are hopeful, ever hopeful, and indeed often too hopeful. But their hopes and dreams, however big, are usually brief and soon damaged by the realities of life. Ultimately, most patients with bipolar disorder become chronically depressed, denied of their hopes by others. Appropriate medication treatment is necessary, but not sufficient, for many such persons. The job of the clinician is twofold initially: first, to seek to existentially be with manic patients and then, to counterprojectively give perspective to those patients about their manic worldview, without completely denying it. This twofold approach then can lead to a healthy therapeutic alliance, which itself has a mood-stabilizing effect. Along with mood-stabilizing medications, this alliance can then lead patients toward full recovery. Put more simply, clinicians need to talk to manic patients about their hopes, to explore the limits of their grandiosity without judging it, to seek out their strengths and to validate them. They also need to go where the patients are, to encounter patients and find the person beneath the illness, to provide a strong relationship, an alliance that cannot be shaken, to conflict with the patient sometimes and not at other times. It is a tall order, and one not infrequently avoided. Yet the times seem to call for a return to actually talking with manic patients, and maybe curing them with such talk. Or pe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2005.59.2.137

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depressive disorders may be associated with, or exacerbated by, existential despair and lack of meaning.

    “Depressive disorders may be associated with, or exacerbated by, existential despair and lack of meaning (Ghaemi, 2007;Havens & Ghaemi, 2005;Simon, Arndt, Greenberg, Solomon, & Pyszczynski, 1998).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Havens, L. L., & Ghaemi, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychotherapy
Published
2005-04
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
137-147
ISSN
  • 0002-9564 (ISSN-L)
  • 2575-6559
OpenAlex
W1517437008
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-64189, K23MH064189)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
bipolar disorder, manic episodes, therapeutic relationship, existential despair, mood stabilization, countertransference, grandiosity, hope, validation, chronic depression
MeSH terms
Affect, Bipolar Disorder, Existentialism, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review