CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 303Mental Health and Patient InvolvementDisability Rights and RepresentationPsychiatric care and mental health services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Connectedness and citizenship: redefining social integration.

Ware, Norma C., Hopper, Kim, Tugenberg, Toni, Dickey, Barbara, Fisher, Daniel·2007·Psychiatric Services
DOI 10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.469
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Despite decades of deinstitutionalization, individuals with psychiatric disabilities living outside the hospital may be described as in the community, but not of it. To effectively address the persisting problem of social exclusion of persons with psychiatric disabilities, new conceptual tools are needed. To address this need, a new definition of social integration is offered.The definition is based on data from a qualitative study. Data collection consisted of individual, unstructured interviews with 56 adults who have been psychiatrically disabled (N=78 interviews) as well as ethnographic visits to five service sites working to promote social integration for their users (N=8 visits). An interpretive approach was used to analyze the data.Social integration is defined as a process, unfolding over time, through which individuals who have been psychiatrically disabled increasingly develop and exercise their capacities for connectedness and citizenship. Connectedness denotes the construction and successful maintenance of reciprocal interpersonal relationships. Social, moral, and emotional competencies are required to sustain connectedness. Citizenship refers to the rights and privileges enjoyed by members of a democratic society and to the responsibilities these rights engender. The definition calls for full rights and responsibilities of citizenship.The new definition sets an ideal, but not unrealistic, standard for social integration in the context of psychiatric disability. High standards encourage mental health professionals and policy makers to rethink what is possible for mental health services and to raise expectations for connectedness and citizenship among persons once disabled by mental illness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.469

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Achieving, 2003, Md, Department of Health and Human Services, President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health
  2. Jacobson N, 2004, Tenn
  3. Segal SP, 1978, Aviram U: The Mentally Ill in Community-Based Sheltered Care
  4. Wolfensberger W, 1983, Mental Retardation, 21, 234
  5. Fundamental Principles, 1976, Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation
  6. Barnes C, 1998, London
  7. Sen AK, 1980, Equality of what? in Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Edited by Mc-Murrin S
  8. Nussbaum M, 2006, Nationality, Species Membership
  9. Rowe M, 1999, Crossing the Border
  10. Ahern L, 2001, Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 39, 22
  11. Spaniol L, 2003, The Recovery Workbook: II. Connectedness
  12. Apollon W, 1990, Treating Psychosis [in French]
  13. Cantin L, 2004, Chicago
  14. Bott E, 1957, Norms and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families
  15. Lovell AM, 1992, Marginal Arrangements: Homelessness, Mental Illness and Social Relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
  16. Putnam RD, 1993, Leonardi R

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 302

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ware, N. C., Hopper, K., Tugenberg, T., Dickey, B., & Fisher, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
2007-04
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
469-474
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
DOI
10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.469
OpenAlex
W2169510661
Cited by
303
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 39
FWCI
31.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH065247)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
social integration, psychiatric disability, connectedness, citizenship, social exclusion, deinstitutionalization, interpersonal relationships, social competence, mental health services, community living
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Anthropology, Cultural, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interview, Psychological, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Quality of Life, Social Change, Social Responsibility, Social Values, Socialization, Persons with Intellectual Disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review