The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fidelity to Assertive Community Treatment and Client Outcomes in the New Hampshire Dual Disorders Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study examined the association between fidelity of programs to the assertive community treatment model and client outcomes in dual disorders programs. METHODS: Assertive community treatment programs in the New Hampshire dual disorders study were classified as low-fidelity programs (three programs) or high-fidelity programs (four programs) based on extensive longitudinal process data. The study included 87 clients with a dual diagnosis of severe mental illness and a comorbid substance use disorder. Sixty-one clients were in the high-fidelity programs, and 26 were in the low-fidelity programs. Client outcomes were examined in the domains of substance abuse, housing, psychiatric symptoms, functional status, and quality of life, based on interviews conducted every six months for three years. RESULTS: Clients in the high-fidelity assertive community treatment programs showed greater reductions in alcohol and drug use and attained higher rates of remission from substance use disorders than clients in the low-fidelity programs. Clients in high-fidelity programs had higher rates of retention in treatment and fewer hospital admissions than those in low-fidelity programs. No differences between groups were found in length of hospital stays and other residential measures, psychiatric symptoms, family and social relations, satisfaction with services, and overall life satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Faithful implementation of, and adherence to, the assertive community treatment model for persons with dual disorders was associated with superior outcomes in the substance use domain. The findings underscore the value of measures of model fidelity, and they suggest that local modifications of the assertive community treatment model or failure to comply with it may jeopardize program success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982
The fidelity‐adaptation debate: Implications for the implementation of public sector social programs
Blakely, C. H., Mayer, J. P., Gottschalk, R. G., Schmitt, N., Davidson, W. S., Roitman, D. B., & Emshoff, J. G. (1987) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00922697 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-17 · Cited by 1,355
The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials
Borrelli, B. (2011) · Journal of Public Health Dentistry · doi:10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x · Cited by 970
The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychosocial treatment recommendations and summary statements
Dixon, L. B., Dickerson, F., Bellack, A. S., Bennett, M., Dickinson, D., Goldberg, R. W., Lehman, A., Tenhula, W. N., Calmes, C., Pasillas, R. M., et al. (2010) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp115 · Cited by 774
Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., Mueser, K. T., & Latimer, E. (2001) · Disease Management and Health Outcomes · doi:10.2165/00115677-200109030-00003 · Cited by 614
Self-citationIntensive case management for severe mental illness
Dieterich, M., Irving, C. B., Park, B., & Marshall, M. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007906.pub2 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Teague, G. B., & Xie, H.
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 818-824
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- OpenAlex
- W2115497861
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fidelity to Assertive Community Treatment and Client Outcomes in the New Hampshire Dual Disorders Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ps.50.6.818
- The paper
- McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Teague, G. B., & Xie, H. (1999). Fidelity to Assertive Community Treatment and Client Outcomes in the New Hampshire Dual Disorders Study. Psychiatric Services. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.50.6.818
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.