Cited by 32Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Guided Self-Help Treatment for Recurrent Binge Eating: Replication and Extension

Open access
DeBar, Lynn L., Striegel-Moore, Ruth H., Wilson, G. Terence, Perrin, Nancy, Yarborough, Bobbi Jo, Dickerson, John, Lynch, Frances, Rosselli, Francine +1 more·2011·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to replicate and extend results of a previous blended efficacy and effectiveness trial of a low-intensity, manual-based guided self-help form of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-GSH) for the treatment of binge eating disorders in a large health maintenance organization (HMO) and to compare them with usual care. METHODS: To extend previous findings, the investigators modified earlier recruitment and assessment approaches and conducted a randomized clinical trial to better reflect procedures that may be reasonably carried out in real-world practices. The intervention was delivered by master's-level interventionists to 160 female members of a health maintenance organization who met diagnostic criteria for recurrent binge eating. Data collected at baseline, immediately posttreatment, and at six- and 12-month follow-ups were used in intent-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up, CBT-GSH resulted in greater remission from binge eating (35%, N=26) than usual care (14%, N=10) (number needed to treat=5). The CBT-GSH group also demonstrated greater improvements in dietary restraint (d=.71) and eating, shape, and weight concerns (d=1.10, 1.24, and .98, respectively) but not weight change. CONCLUSIONS: Replication of the pattern of previous findings suggests that CBT-GSH is a robust treatment for patients with recurrent binge eating. The magnitude of changes was significantly smaller than in the original study, however, suggesting that patients recruited and assessed with less intensive procedures may respond differently from their counterparts enrolled in trials requiring more comprehensive procedures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0367

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeBar, L. L., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Wilson, G. T., Perrin, N., Yarborough, B. J., Dickerson, J., Lynch, F., Rosselli, F., & Kraemer, H. C.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
  • Dr. Striegel-Moore and Dr. Rosselli are with the Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut.
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Wesleyan University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2011-04
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
367-373
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2155848601
Cited by
32
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • WESLEYAN
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH066966, R01MH066966)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
binge eating, guided self-help, cognitive behavioral therapy, low-intensity treatment, replication, dietary restraint, eating concerns, body image concern, weight concern, health maintenance organizations, usual care comparison, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Bulimia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Program Development, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review