Guided Self-Help Treatment for Recurrent Binge Eating: Replication and Extension
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to replicate and extend results of a previous blended efficacy and effectiveness trial of a low-intensity, manual-based guided self-help form of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-GSH) for the treatment of binge eating disorders in a large health maintenance organization (HMO) and to compare them with usual care. METHODS: To extend previous findings, the investigators modified earlier recruitment and assessment approaches and conducted a randomized clinical trial to better reflect procedures that may be reasonably carried out in real-world practices. The intervention was delivered by master's-level interventionists to 160 female members of a health maintenance organization who met diagnostic criteria for recurrent binge eating. Data collected at baseline, immediately posttreatment, and at six- and 12-month follow-ups were used in intent-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up, CBT-GSH resulted in greater remission from binge eating (35%, N=26) than usual care (14%, N=10) (number needed to treat=5). The CBT-GSH group also demonstrated greater improvements in dietary restraint (d=.71) and eating, shape, and weight concerns (d=1.10, 1.24, and .98, respectively) but not weight change. CONCLUSIONS: Replication of the pattern of previous findings suggests that CBT-GSH is a robust treatment for patients with recurrent binge eating. The magnitude of changes was significantly smaller than in the original study, however, suggesting that patients recruited and assessed with less intensive procedures may respond differently from their counterparts enrolled in trials requiring more comprehensive procedures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eight studies reported significant improvements in HRQOL.
“Eight studies reported significant improvements in HRQOL”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [117]
Interventions targeting eating disorders were evaluated in four RCTs.
“Interventions targeting eating disorders were evaluated in four RCTs”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [117]
Psychological functioning was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scale in eight studies.
“Psychological functioning was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scale [124] in eight studies”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [117]
Striegel-Moore et al. found the main outcome, abstinence from binge eating, differed significantly between the groups: the initial improvement in abstinence from baseline was greater for the intervention group than usual care (p<0.001).
“The main outcome, abstinence from binge eating differed significantly between the groups: the initial improvement in abstinence from baseline was greater for the intervention group than usual care (p<0.001).”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [117]
Cites
Psychological Treatments of Binge Eating Disorder
Wilson, G. T., Wilfley, D. E., Agras, W. S., & Bryson, S. W. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.170 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Self-citationBinge eating disorder treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Brownley, K. A., Berkman, N. D., Sedway, J. A., Lohr, K. N., & Bulik, C. M. (2007) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20370 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Grilo, C. M., & Masheb, R. M. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.11.010 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Clarke, G. N. (1995) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.63.5.718 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Cognitive Behavioral Guided Self-Help for the Treatment of Recurrent Binge Eating
Striegel-Moore, R. H., Wilson, G. T., DeBar, L., Perrin, N., Lynch, F., Rosselli, F., & Kraemer, H. C. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018915 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationCost-effectiveness of guided self-help treatment for recurrent binge eating
Lynch, F. L., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Dickerson, J. F., Perrin, N., DeBar, L., Wilson, G. T., & Kraemer, H. C. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018982 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dineen-Griffin, S., Garcia-Cardenas, V., Williams, K., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220116 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Striegel Weissman, R., & Rosselli, F. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.006 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationFarrand, P., & Woodford, J. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.001 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Linardon, J., Hindle, A., & Brennan, L. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22850 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Guided self-help for eating disorders: a systematic review and metaregression
Traviss‐Turner, G. D., West, R. M., & Hill, A. J. (2017) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2507 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- DeBar, L. L., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Wilson, G. T., Perrin, N., Yarborough, B. J., Dickerson, J., Lynch, F., Rosselli, F., & Kraemer, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
- Dr. Striegel-Moore and Dr. Rosselli are with the Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut.
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Wesleyan University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-373
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- PMC
- PMC3962509
- OpenAlex
- W2155848601
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- WESLEYAN
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH066966, R01MH066966)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- binge eating, guided self-help, cognitive behavioral therapy, low-intensity treatment, replication, dietary restraint, eating concerns, body image concern, weight concern, health maintenance organizations, usual care comparison, women
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bulimia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Program Development, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review