The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency
Abstract
The focus of this article is planning for resiliency in the aftermath of a catastrophe. First, the authors offer their conception of planning for resiliency as a goal for recovering communities, and the benefits of planning in efforts to create more resilient places. Next, they discuss major issues associated with planning for postdisaster recovery, including barriers posed by federal and state governments to planning for resiliency, the promise and risks of compact urban form models for guiding rebuilding, and the failure to involve citizens in planning for disasters. Finally, they discuss lessons from prior research that address these issues and policy recommendations that foster predisaster recovery planning for resilient communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Theory on Urban Resilience to Floods--A Basis for Alternative Planning Practices
Liao, K.-H. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05231-170448 · Cited by 537
Ouyang, M., & Wang, Z. (2015) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.011 · Cited by 408
Burton, C. G. (2015) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.960039 · Cited by 408
Binder, S. B., & Greer, A. (2016) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v4i4.738 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Berke, P. R., & Campanella, T. J.
- Venue
- The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 604
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 192-207
- ISSN
- 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2149859556
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0002716205285533
- The paper
- Berke, P. R., & Campanella, T. J. (2006). Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
