CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 213Policing Practices and PerceptionsEthics in Business and EducationCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Dirty Harry Problem

Klockars, Carl B.·1980·The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
DOI 10.1177/000271628045200104
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Policing constantly places its practitioners in situations in which good ends can be achieved by dirty means. When the ends to be achieved are urgent and unquestionably good and only a dirty means will work to achieve them, the policeman faces a genuine moral dilemma. A genuine moral dilemma is a situation from which one cannot emerge inno cent no matter what one does—employ a dirty means, em ploy an insufficiently dirty means, or walk away. In such situations in policing, Dirty Harry problems, the danger lies not in becoming guilty of wrong—that is inevitable—but in thinking that one has found a way to escape a dilemma which is inescapable. Dire consequences result from this misunder standing. Policemen lose their sense of moral proportion, fail to care, turn cynical, or allow their passionate caring to lead them to employ dirty means too crudely or too readily. The only means of assuring that dirty means will not be used too readily or too crudely is to punish those who use them and the agency which endorses their use.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000271628045200104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 213

Related

Metadata

Authors
Klockars, C. B.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Klockars, Carl B.
Venue
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1980-11
Volume
452
Issue
1
Pages
33-47
ISSN
  • 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3349
DOI
10.1177/000271628045200104
OpenAlex
W1999759788
Cited by
213
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
police ethics, ethical dilemmas, police misconduct, police accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review