Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 624

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Community, Citizenship, and the third Way

ROSE, NIKOLAS·2000·American Behavioral Scientist
DOI 10.1177/00027640021955955
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article analyses recent debates about the Third Way in politics in Britain and the United States. It suggests that what is most significant is the emergence of a new politics of conduct that seeks to reconstruct citizens as moral subjects of responsible communities. The author considers the presuppositions of such a politics and its implications for technologies of government.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00027640021955955

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 624

Metadata

Authors
ROSE, N.
Venue
American Behavioral Scientist
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2000-06
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
1395-1411
ISSN
  • 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3381
DOI
10.1177/00027640021955955
OpenAlex
W2077734388
Cited by
624
References
22
FWCI
30.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community, Citizenship, and the third Way. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00027640021955955
The paper
ROSE, N. (2000). Community, Citizenship, and the third Way. American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640021955955

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.