Cited by 60Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Making the Most of Multiple Measures: Disentangling the Effects of Different Dimensions of Race in Survey Research

Saperstein, Aliya, Kizer, Jessica M., Penner, Andrew M.·2016·American Behavioral Scientist

Abstract

The majority of social science research uses a single measure of race when investigating racial inequality. However, a growing body of work demonstrates that race shapes the life chances of individuals in multiple ways, related not only to how people self-identify but also to how others perceive them. As multiple measures of race are increasingly collected and used in survey research, it becomes important to consider the best methods of leveraging such data. We present four analytical approaches for incorporating two different dimensions of race in the same study and illustrate their use with data from the U.S. National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. The approaches range from tests of specific hypotheses to the most exploratory description of how different measures of race relate to social inequality. Although each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, by accounting for the multidimensionality of race, they all allow for more nuanced patterns of advantage and disadvantage than standard single-measure methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002764215613399

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Racial category and measurement choices can affect outcomes being measured in survey research.

    “a growing body of survey research has highlighted the impact that racial category and measurement choices can have on outcomes being measured [102-104].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [104]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 60

Authors
Saperstein, A., Kizer, J. M., & Penner, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Saperstein, Aliya
Venue
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2015-10-30
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
519-537
ISSN
  • 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3381
OpenAlex
W2265723414
Cited by
60
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Behavioral Scientist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
racial inequality, self-identification, perceived race, racial classification, social inequality, adolescent to adult health, survey data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review