The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Structure of Disadvantage: Individual and Occupational Determinants of the Black-White Wage Gap
Abstract
This study is motivated by the idea that the racial gap in earnings is generated not only by individual differences but also by systematic variation in the occupational structure that attenuates or exacerbates the effects of race. Using data from the 1990 census and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, a hierarchical linear modeling approach is employed that allows the simultaneous exploration of the mechanisms of income inequality operating both within and between occupations. Among private-sector employees, striking evidence shows that racial disparities increase in both absolute and percentage terms as one moves up the occupational earnings hierarchy. The association between average occupational earnings and within-occupation racial disadvantage reveals an overlooked source of racial earnings inequality which constrains the opportunities available to upwardly mobile black men in the private sector. This association cannot be explained by measured individual characteristics, or by the status, demographic composition, or skill demands of occupations. In the public sector, on the other hand, racial inequality in earnings is not systematically associated with average occupational earnings, and is instead more closely tied to individual human capital and occupational placement. The implications of these results are considered and directions for future research are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farkas, G., & Vicknair, K. (1996) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096392 · Cited by 121
Cited by
A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement.
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82 · Cited by 2,163
Black‐White Wage Inequality, Employment Rates, and Incarceration
Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/432780 · Cited by 354
Divergent Paths: A New Perspective on Earnings Differences Between Black and White Men Since 1940
Bayer, P., & Charles, K. K. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjy003 · Cited by 217
Hardaway, C. R., & McLoyd, V. C. (2009) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9354-z · Cited by 213
Measures of “Race” and the analysis of racial inequality in Brazil
Bailey, S. R., Loveman, M., & Muniz, J. O. (2013) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.06.006 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Grodsky, E., & Pager, D.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 542-567
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2111956592
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.