Cited by 414Contemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeCritical Theory and PhilosophyPolitical Economy and Marxism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transforming Capitalism through Real Utopias

Wright, Erik Olin·2013·American Sociological Review

Abstract

This address explores a broad framework for thinking sociologically about emancipatory alternatives to dominant institutions and social structures, especially capitalism. The framework is grounded in two foundational propositions: (1) Many forms of human suffering and many deficits in human flourishing are the result of existing institutions and social structures. (2) Transforming existing institutions and social structures in the right way has the potential to substantially reduce human suffering and expand the possibilities for human flourishing. An emancipatory social science responding to these propositions faces four broad tasks: specifying the moral principles for judging social institutions; using these moral principles as the standards for diagnosis and critique of existing institutions; developing an account of viable alternatives in response to the critique; and proposing a theory of transformation for realizing those alternatives. The idea of “real utopias” is one way of thinking about alternatives and transformation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122412468882

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Belsky Leah, 2010, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 17
  2. Benkler Yochai, 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
  3. Block Fred, 1977, Socialist Revolution, 33, 6
  4. 10.1525/9780520341166 · DOI
  5. Fraser Nancy, 1997, Justice Interruptus
  6. Fraser Nancy, 2000, New Left Review, 3, 107
  7. Gastil John, 2012, Presented at the 2012 annual meeting of the American Sociological Association
  8. 10.7208/chicago/9780226321158.001.0001 · DOI
  9. 10.4324/9781849774338 · DOI
  10. Lindbloom Charles, 1977, Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems
  11. Offe Claus, 1974, German Political Studies, 31
  12. 10.1017/CBO9781139171830 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511488863 · DOI
  14. Schor Juliet, 1993, The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure
  15. Sen Amartya, 1999, Development as Freedom
  16. Therborn Göran, 1978, What Does the Ruling Class Do When It Rules?
  17. Wright Erik Olin, 2010, Envisioning Real Utopias
  18. Wright Erik Olin, 2011, American Society: How It Really Works

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wright, E. O.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2012-12-26
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
1-25
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2111565199
Cited by
414
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
30.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • Acta Académica (Acta Académica) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
capitalism, social institutions, social structure, human suffering, eudaimonia, institutional critique, utopia, sociology of institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review