Cited by 507Social and Cultural DynamicsCultural Differences and ValuesContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice

Improving Cultural Analysis: Considering Personal Culture in its Declarative and Nondeclarative Modes

Lizardo, Omar·2017·American Sociological Review

Abstract

While influential across a wide variety of subfields, cultural analysis in sociology continues to be hampered by coarse-grained conceptualizations of the different modes in which culture becomes personal, as well as the process via which persons acquire and use different forms of culture. In this article, I argue that persons acquire and use culture in two analytically and empirically distinct forms, which I label declarative and nondeclarative. The mode of cultural acquisition depends on the dynamics of exposure and encoding, and modulates the process of cultural accessibility, activation, and use. Cultural knowledge about one domain may be redundantly represented in both declarative and nondeclarative forms, each linked via analytically separable pathways to corresponding public cultural forms and ultimately to substantive outcomes. I outline how the new theoretical vocabulary, theoretical model, and analytic distinctions that I propose can be used to resolve contradictions and improve our understanding of outstanding substantive issues in empirically oriented subfields that have recently incorporated cultural processes as a core explanatory resource.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122416675175

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many advocates of the interdisciplinary tradition have accepted Lizardo's (2017) distinction between declarative and non-declarative personal culture, understood as two forms of cultural cognition.

    “Third, many advocates of IT have accepted Lizardo's (2017) distinction between declarative and non-declarative personal culture, which can be understood as two forms of cultural cognition.”
  • Lizardo's taxonomy of different forms of public and personal culture is the most ambitious theoretical application of embodied approaches to cultural cognition.

    “The most ambitious theoretical application of the embodied approaches to cultural cognition can be found from Omar Lizardo's taxonomy of different forms of public and personal culture that he has developed in a series of recent articles (e.g. Lizardo,2012, 2015, 2017, 2021; Lizardo etal.,2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lizardo, O.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2016-12-08
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
88-115
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2559970435
Cited by
507
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6
FWCI
65.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Keywords
cultural analysis, declarative knowledge, cultural acquisition, cultural exposure, access to culture, cultural uses, personal culture, public culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review