Cited by 312Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceSocial and Cultural Dynamics

The Global Increase in the Socioeconomic Achievement Gap, 1964 to 2015

Open access
Chmielewski, Anna K.·2019·American Sociological Review

Abstract

The “socioeconomic achievement gap”—the disparity in academic achievement between students from high- and low-socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds—is well-known in the sociology of education. The SES achievement gap has been documented across a wide range of countries. Yet in most countries, we do not know whether the SES achievement gap has been changing over time. This study combines 30 international large-scale assessments over 50 years, representing 100 countries and about 5.8 million students. SES achievement gaps are computed between the 90th and 10th percentiles of three available measures of family SES: parents’ education, parents’ occupation, and the number of books in the home. Results indicate that, for each of the three SES variables examined, achievement gaps increased in a majority of sample countries. Yet there is substantial cross-national variation in the size of increases in SES achievement gaps. The largest increases are observed in countries with rapidly increasing school enrollments, implying that expanding access reveals educational inequality that was previously hidden outside the school system. However, gaps also increased in many countries with consistently high enrollments, suggesting that cognitive skills are an increasingly important dimension of educational stratification worldwide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122419847165

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chmielewski (2019) finds that achievement gaps have increased in most countries.

    “Chmielewski (2019) finds that achievement gaps have increased in most countries.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Chmielewski (2019)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chmielewski, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Chmielewski, Anna K.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2019-05-16
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
517-544
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2920039906
Cited by
312
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 8
FWCI
61.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • jacobs foundation
  • national academy of education
  • spencer foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
Keywords
socioeconomic achievement gap, educational inequality, academic performance, family socioeconomic status, parental education, parental occupation, large-scale assessment, cross-national comparison, school enrollment expansion, educational stratification, cognitive skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review