Complaint-Oriented Policing: Regulating Homelessness in Public Space
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, cities across the United States have adopted quality-of-life ordinances aimed at policing social marginality. Scholars have documented zero-tolerance policing and emerging tactics of therapeutic policing in these efforts, but little attention has been paid to 911 calls and forms of third-party policing in governing public space and the poor. Drawing on an analysis of 3.9 million 911 and 311 call records and participant observation alongside police officers, social workers, and homeless men and women residing on the streets of San Francisco, this article elaborates a model of “complaint-oriented policing” to explain additional causes and consequences of policing visible poverty. Situating the police within a broader bureaucratic field of poverty governance, I demonstrate how policing aimed at the poor can be initiated by callers, organizations, and government agencies, and how police officers manage these complaints in collaboration and conflict with health, welfare, and sanitation agencies. Expanding the conception of the criminalization of poverty, which is often centered on incarceration or arrest, the study reveals previously unforeseen consequences of move-along orders, citations, and threats that dispossess the poor of property, create barriers to services and jobs, and increase vulnerability to violence and crime.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In large cities, complaint-oriented policing is disproportionately likely to target marginalized populations, particularly unsheltered persons and those with severe mental illness.
“In large cities, this so-called “complaint-oriented” policing is disproportionately likely to target marginalized populations, particularly unsheltered persons and those with severe mental illness who may already be weary of police contact (Herring, 2019;Reinhard, 2024).”
From Diverting 911 calls: Lessons from early adopting urban jurisdictions (2024) · cites this paper as Herring, 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 275
- Authors
- Herring, C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Herring, Chris
- ORCID
- Herring, Chris
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-09-05
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 769-800
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2971679767
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 97.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- UC Berkeley Human Rights Center
- Center for Engaged Scholarship
- Division of Social and Economic Sciences
- horowitz foundation for social policy
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- homelessness, public space, criminalization of poverty, poverty governance, 911 calls, third-party policing, citation, social marginality, San Francisco, street homelessness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review