Cited by 16Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

The Practice of Pancreatic Resection after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Barbour, John R., Thomas, Bryan N., Morgan, Katherine A., Byrne, T. Karl, Adams, David B.·2008·The American Surgeon™

Abstract

The morbid obesity epidemic in the United States has resulted in increasing numbers of patients who have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass who require surgical management of nonbariatric disorders. When pancreatic resection is indicated in bariatric patients, consideration of the altered foregut anatomy can be applied to the principles of pancreatic resection to foster effective techniques that minimize operative complications. A retrospective review and analysis of bariatric patients who underwent pancreatic resection at the Medical University of South Carolina Digestive Center over a 2-year period (2006 to 2007) was conducted to assess indications for operation, operative techniques, and postoperative outcome in patients with previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. There were five patients (four female, one male) identified with a mean age of 35 years (range, 32-50 years). The mean time interval from gastric bypass to pancreatic resection was 42.6 months (range, 10-72 months). Indications for pancreatic operations were islet hyperplasia in two patients, chronic pancreatitis in two, and serous cystadenoma in one. Two patients underwent duodenal-preserving pancreatic head resection (Beger procedure) and three underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Mean length of hospital stay was 11.4 days (range, 5-22 days). Two patients had extended hospital stay as a result of gastrointestinal ileus. There was no other operative morbidity or mortality. Mean length of patient follow u…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000313480807400811

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbour, J. R., Thomas, B. N., Morgan, K. A., Byrne, T. K., & Adams, D. B.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Barbour, John R.
Venue
The American Surgeon™
Published
2008-08
Volume
74
Issue
8
Pages
729-734
ISSN
  • 0003-1348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-9823
OpenAlex
W2177634336
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Surgeon (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
pancreatic resection, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, duodenal-preserving pancreatic head resection, Beger procedure, distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, islet hyperplasia, chronic pancreatitis, serous cystadenoma, Roux limb, postoperative ileus, morbid obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Morbid, Pancreatectomy, Pancreatic Diseases, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Gastric Bypass, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review